The Claude Code Humanizer Plugin: Using Wikipedia Rules to Hide AI Writing
Siqi Chen's new Claude Code Humanizer plugin uses Wikipedia's AI detection rules to help Claude models sound more human and avoid detection. Explore the technical irony.
They've shaken hands, but one side is hiding a fist. In an ironic twist of tech development, the rules designed to catch AI are now being used to make it invisible. Tech entrepreneur Siqi Chen just released Humanizer, an open-source plugin for Anthropic's Claude Code assistant that instructs the AI to stop writing like a robot.
Claude Code Humanizer Plugin: The Paradox of Detection
The source material for this 'cloaking device' isn't a secret manual, but a public guide from WikiProject AI Cleanup. Since late 2023, these Wikipedia editors have been hunting AI-generated content. In August 2025, they published a list of 24 language patterns that scream 'chatbot.' Chen's tool feeds these exact patterns back to Claude as a list of things to avoid, gaining over 1,600 stars on GitHub within days.
Swapping Fluff for Opinions
Chatbots love to describe things as "nestled within" or "marking a pivotal moment." The Humanizer plugin tells the AI to ditch this inflated language for plain facts. More interestingly, it encourages the AI to have opinions. Instead of neutrally listing pros and cons, it might say, "I genuinely don't know how to feel about this." By mimicking human indecision, it subverts the common traits of predictable machine output.
| Aspect | Humanizer Plugin Effect |
|---|---|
| Tone | Less precise, more casual/opinionated |
| Language | Removes Wikipedia-flagged patterns |
| Factuality | No improvement; stays the same |
| Cost | Requires paid Claude subscription |
The Risk of Casual Code
It's not all smooth sailing. While the plugin makes text sound more human, it doesn't necessarily make it better. For technical documentation, having an 'opinion' can be a drawback. Furthermore, limited testing suggests it might even harm the model's coding ability. The core issue remains: detection is a losing game. A 2025 study found that while experts spot AI 90% of the time, a 10% false positive rate means high-quality human writing often gets caught in the crossfire.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
OpenAI rehires Barret Zoph to lead enterprise AI efforts as its market share drops to 27%. Learn how Anthropic's 40% lead is reshaping OpenAI's 2026 strategy.
Anthropic's Claude Code has crossed $1 billion in ARR, driven by the revolutionary Claude Opus 4.5 model. Explore how AI agents are transforming software development in 2025.
Microsoft is reportedly encouraging thousands of employees to use Anthropic's Claude Code internally. Explore the impact of Microsoft Claude Code adoption 2026 on the AI dev tools market.
Developer Siqi Chen introduces Humanizer, an AI writing tool that uses Wikipedia's detection guide to generate human-sounding text via Anthropic's Claude.