Meta's $0.07-Per-Message WhatsApp AI Tax Sparks Developer Revolt

If your AI chatbot handles 10,000 conversations daily on WhatsApp, you'll now pay Meta$691 every single day. That's the new reality for developers in Italy, where the company just announced its $0.0691 per message pricing for AI responses.

When Regulation Meets Revenue

Meta's Wednesday announcement marks a dramatic pivot from its original plan to simply ban all third-party AI chatbots on WhatsApp. The January 15 deadline came and went, forcing popular services like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Microsoft's Copilot off the platform. But Italy's competition watchdog had other plans, demanding Meta suspend its blanket ban last December.

Now, starting February 16, developers serving Italian users will face what amounts to a per-conversation tax. For context, this pricing could generate massive bills – a moderately popular AI service handling 100,000 daily interactions would rack up nearly $7,000 in daily fees to Meta.

The company already charges businesses for template messages like shipping updates and payment reminders through its WhatsApp Business API. But AI responses are different – they're dynamic, unpredictable, and potentially endless. "Where we are legally required to provide AI chatbots through the WhatsApp business API, we are introducing pricing," a Meta spokesperson told TechCrunch.

The Gatekeeper's Dilemma

Meta's original justification was technical: "Our systems weren't designed to handle responses from AI bots and were being strained." But critics saw something else – a platform acting as the ultimate gatekeeper, deciding which AI services billions of users could access.

The regulatory pushback was swift. The EU launched anticompetitive probes, Brazil's watchdog initially sided against Meta (though a court later overturned that decision), and Italy forced this compromise. Each region is essentially asking: Should WhatsApp, with its 2 billion users, function as a de facto app store for AI services?

The Developer Exodus Begins

Major AI companies saw the writing on the wall. OpenAI, Perplexity, and Microsoft all announced their WhatsApp bots would shut down on January 15, urging users to access their services elsewhere. For developers still in the game, they're now forced to send pre-defined messages redirecting users to their websites or apps – essentially turning WhatsApp into a glorified billboard.

This creates a fascinating market dynamic. Only well-funded AI companies or those with extremely high-value use cases can justify Meta's pricing. Smaller developers and experimental AI services are effectively priced out, potentially stifling innovation in conversational AI.

The Precedent Problem

Meta's Italian experiment could become the template for other regions facing similar regulatory pressure. If the model proves financially viable while satisfying regulators, expect it to roll out wherever Meta faces similar mandates.

But there's a deeper question: Is this actually solving the competition problem, or just monetizing it? Critics might argue that Meta has found a way to maintain its gatekeeper position while generating revenue from it – hardly the outcome regulators intended.