Meta New Mexico trial evidence exclusion: Tech giant fights to keep suicide cases and Harvard past out of court

They’re heading to court, but the defense is already building a wall. As Meta prepares to face trial in New Mexico over allegations that it failed to protect minors from sexual exploitation, the company is making an aggressive push to scrub sensitive context from the proceedings.

Meta New Mexico Trial Evidence Exclusion Strategy

According to Reuters, Meta has petitioned the judge to exclude several key pieces of information. The company wants to bar research studies on youth mental health, any mention of high-profile teen suicide cases linked to social media, and even details about the company's massive financial resources.

Interestingly, Meta’s legal team is also seeking to block references to Mark Zuckerberg’s undergraduate years at Harvard University and the personal activities of its employees. These requests, known as motions in limine, are standard pretrial maneuvers designed to ensure that a jury isn't swayed by irrelevant or prejudicial information, ensuring a fair trial for the defendant.

Protecting a Fair Trial vs. Hiding Corporate Liability

While Meta argues these exclusions are necessary to keep the focus on the actual facts of the New Mexico case, critics view the move as an attempt to distance the company from the systemic issues its platforms may have caused. The judge's decision on what stays and what goes will define how much of Meta's internal awareness can be used against it in court.