ICE 4th Amendment Violation: Minnesota Judge Rejects Warrantless Home Entry

A federal judge just sent a clear message: internal agency memos don't trump the Constitution. Last Saturday, a Minnesota court ruled that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents violated the Fourth Amendment by using a battering ram to enter a man's home without a judicial warrant.

The ICE 4th Amendment Violation in the Twin Cities

The case centers on Garrison Gibson, a Liberian national living under supervision. On January 11, 2026, agents surrounded his home in the early morning. Despite Gibson's repeated demands for a judge-signed warrant, agents returned with reinforcements and a battering ram, allegedly deploying pepper spray toward neighbors before storming the residence with rifles drawn.

District Court Judge Jeffrey Bryan ruled on January 17 that this conduct was unconstitutional. "This arrest violated the Fourth Amendment," Bryan stated, noting that the agents lacked both consent and a judicial warrant.

Sponsored

Advertise with Us

[email protected]

Sponsored

Whistleblowers Expose Secret ICE Directive

This wasn't an isolated incident. According to Whistleblower Aid, an internal ICE directive regarding Form I-205 (Warrant of Removal) falsely instructs officers that this administrative document is sufficient for home entries. Unlike judicial warrants, these are signed by ICE supervisors rather than independent judges.

Legal scholar Orin Kerr warned that allowing executive-issued warrants to justify home entry would eliminate crucial judicial oversight. Despite the ruling, Gibson was re-arrested on January 18 during a routine check-in, highlighting the agency's persistent detention authority even when specific arrest methods are found illegal.