AI's Copyright War Reignites: 'Bad Blood' Author Leads New Lawsuit Against OpenAI, Google, and 4 Others
'Bad Blood' author John Carreyrou is leading a new copyright lawsuit against six AI giants including OpenAI and Google, signaling deep dissatisfaction with a prior $1.5B settlement and challenging AI's core data practices.
Just when the AI industry thought its copyright battles were settling down, a new legal firestorm is erupting. A group of writers, including Theranos whistleblower and “Bad Blood” author John Carreyrou, is filing a new lawsuit against six major AI companies: Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, Meta, xAI, and Perplexity. They accuse the companies of a foundational sin: training their powerful LLMs on pirated copies of their books.
Why a $1.5 Billion Settlement Wasn't Enough
This legal challenge echoes a previous class-action suit against Anthropic. In that case, a judge ruled that while it was legal for AI companies to train on pirated books, the act of pirating the books in the first place was not. That lawsuit concluded with a $1.5 billion settlement from Anthropic, allowing eligible writers to receive about $3,000.
However, some authors were deeply dissatisfied. They argue the settlement fails to hold AI companies accountable for using stolen material to generate billions in revenue. According to the new lawsuit, the previous Anthropic settlement "seems to serve [the AI companies], not creators." The filing states that LLM companies shouldn't be able to extinguish high-value claims at "bargain-basement rates" and avoid the true cost of their infringement.
A Broadening War on Data Sourcing
By targeting a wide array of industry leaders, this new lawsuit signals a significant escalation. It's no longer about a single company; it's a coordinated challenge against the entire industry's data acquisition practices. The outcome could set a critical precedent for how AI models are built, sourced, and monetized in the future.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
Hundreds gathered at ClawCon to celebrate OpenClaw, an open-source AI platform challenging Big Tech's closed models. A look at the growing developer revolt.
Harvard grad's AI-powered microphone jammer promises privacy protection but faces fierce technical skepticism. Why the debate reveals more than the device itself.
xAI's failed legal challenge against California's AB 2013 reveals deeper tensions between AI innovation and public accountability
Grammarly's AI feature uses deceased academics and living experts without permission to provide writing advice, sparking privacy and consent concerns in the AI age.
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation