Italy Launches Microsoft Activision Blizzard Investigation Over 'Aggressive' Mobile Sales
Italy's AGCM has launched a Microsoft Activision Blizzard investigation into 'aggressive' sales practices and dark patterns in Diablo Immortal and CoD Mobile.
Is 'free-to-play' actually a financial trap? Italy's competition regulator isn't taking any chances. Microsoft'sActivision Blizzard is now under fire as the country examines whether its biggest mobile titles use predatory tactics to squeeze money from players.
Inside the Microsoft Activision Blizzard Investigation in Italy
The Autorita Garante della Concorrenza E Del Mercato (AGCM), Italy’s competition authority, announced two separate probes into the tech giant. The focus lies on Diablo Immortal and Call of Duty Mobile, alleging that these games use misleading and aggressive sales practices. According to the regulator, these design elements induce users—particularly children—to play for extended periods and spend money out of a fear of missing out (FOMO).
The investigation also scrutinizes the games' default settings. Reportedly, the AGCM found that parental controls often let minors make purchases or chat with strangers by default. Furthermore, privacy concerns were raised regarding a consent process that seemingly forces users to agree to all data harvesting options during signup. The regulator stated the company might be breaching consumer protection rules by failing to exercise professional diligence in a sector sensitive to gaming addiction.
| Game Title | Regulatory Concern |
|---|---|
| Diablo Immortal | Aggressive microtransactions and high-priced currency bundles |
| Call of Duty Mobile | Design elements inducing compulsive play and FOMO |
| General Platform | Weak default parental controls and forced data consent |
Authors
Related Articles
Samsung Electronics' union branch revealed that 84% of survey respondents oppose the government's roughly $290 billion (₩400 trillion) semiconductor megaproject in Gwangju. Government, management, the union and shareholders are all reading the same national project in sharply different ways.
Nvidia shipped roughly a billion RISC-V cores in 2024, then announced it would run CUDA on the open standard. We break down how royalty-free instruction sets and open software stacks are trying to route around CUDA's lock-in. Part 2 of the Semiconductor Sovereignty series.
US AI-chip export controls split into three layers in the first half of 2026 — January easing, a May crackdown on circumvention, and a pending bill. Nvidia erased China from its guidance and still posted a record $81.6 billion quarter. A look at the export policy that both shields and cages it.
AMD's MI325X matches or beats Nvidia on memory and bandwidth — yet Nvidia's 86-92% share holds. The real moat is CUDA, 20 years in the making. Part 1 of 4.
Samsung Electronics' union branch revealed that 84% of survey respondents oppose the government's roughly $290 billion (₩400 trillion) semiconductor megaproject in Gwangju. Government, management, the union and shareholders are all reading the same national project in sharply different ways.
Nvidia shipped roughly a billion RISC-V cores in 2024, then announced it would run CUDA on the open standard. We break down how royalty-free instruction sets and open software stacks are trying to route around CUDA's lock-in. Part 2 of the Semiconductor Sovereignty series.
US AI-chip export controls split into three layers in the first half of 2026 — January easing, a May crackdown on circumvention, and a pending bill. Nvidia erased China from its guidance and still posted a record $81.6 billion quarter. A look at the export policy that both shields and cages it.
AMD's MI325X matches or beats Nvidia on memory and bandwidth — yet Nvidia's 86-92% share holds. The real moat is CUDA, 20 years in the making. Part 1 of 4.
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation