PayPal's Honey Under Fire: Lawsuits Allege It's a 'Scam' That Steals from Creators and Small Businesses
PayPal's Honey extension faces a firestorm of controversy and lawsuits from YouTubers over allegations it "steals" commissions and exploits businesses. We break down the accusations.
The Breakdown
PayPal's Honey, the widely popular browser extension celebrated for unearthing online coupon codes, is now at the center of a major controversy. A series of damning accusations, which include claims of siphoning money from content creators and exploiting small businesses, have culminated in class-action lawsuits from prominent YouTubers.
The Accusations: "Stealing Money from Influencers"
The scandal ignited after a deep-dive investigation by YouTuber MegaLag. In a 2024 video, he accused Honey of “stealing money from influencers” by exploiting a system called last-click attribution to swap its own tracking cookies for theirs at the last second. A follow-up video leveled even more serious allegations, claiming Honey:
- Targeted minors by sponsoring YouTubers with large, young audiences, like Mr Beast.
- Collected data on people who had never even signed up for its service.
- Exploited small businesses by using their private coupon codes, causing revenue loss, and then allegedly pressuring them to sign up as official partners.
PayPal's Defense and the Legal Fallout
In a statement following the first video, PayPal defended its subsidiary, stating that Honey follows “industry rules and practices” like last-click attribution. However, this explanation failed to appease creators who believe they've lost significant income. The backlash has now escalated to the legal system, with channels like Legal Eagle and GamersNexus leading a new class-action lawsuit against PayPal over its practices.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
OpenAI is asking contractors to upload real work files to set a human baseline for its next-gen AI models. This move highlights a new data strategy and significant legal risks.
Google and Character.AI are negotiating settlements over teen suicide cases linked to AI chatbots. A pivotal moment for AI liability and ethics in 2026.
A massive Condé Nast data breach in 2025 has exposed 2.3 million WIRED user records, with 40 million more at risk. Learn why Ars Technica stayed safe.
Coupang reports a data breach by a former employee who accessed 33 million accounts but only saved data from 3,000, which has been recovered. No data was shared externally.
OpenAI is asking contractors to upload real work files to set a human baseline for its next-gen AI models. This move highlights a new data strategy and significant legal risks.
Google and Character.AI are negotiating settlements over teen suicide cases linked to AI chatbots. A pivotal moment for AI liability and ethics in 2026.
A massive Condé Nast data breach in 2025 has exposed 2.3 million WIRED user records, with 40 million more at risk. Learn why Ars Technica stayed safe.
Coupang reports a data breach by a former employee who accessed 33 million accounts but only saved data from 3,000, which has been recovered. No data was shared externally.