xAI's Last Co-Founders Are Gone. What's Left?
All 11 of xAI's original co-founders have now left Elon Musk's AI startup. With the company absorbed into SpaceX and declared 'rebuilt from foundations,' what does this mean for Grok—and for Musk's AI ambitions?
Eleven Co-Founders. Zero Remaining.
When Elon Musk launched xAI in 2023, he brought 11 co-founders on board. As of this week, that number stands at zero.
According to Business Insider, the final two co-founders—Manuel Kroiss and Ross Nordeen—have both left the company. Kroiss, who led xAI's pretraining team, told people he was departing earlier this month. Nordeen, widely described as Musk's "right-hand operator," followed him out the door last Friday. Both reported directly to Musk. TechCrunch has reached out to xAI for comment.
The timing is hard to ignore. Just weeks ago, Musk publicly admitted that xAI "was not built right the first time around" and announced it was being "rebuilt from the foundations up." The company is now folding into SpaceX, which is reportedly planning an IPO—bringing SpaceX, xAI, and X (formerly Twitter) under one corporate umbrella.
Why This Matters Beyond the Headlines
Co-founder departures happen in Silicon Valley every week. But the complete erasure of a founding team—every single one of 11 people—within roughly two years of launch is a different signal.
Kroiss wasn't a peripheral figure. Leading the pretraining team means he was central to how Grok, xAI's flagship model, actually learns. His exit raises a practical question: who now owns the technical direction of xAI's next-generation models? Nordeen's background adds another layer—he came from Tesla and was reportedly involved in orchestrating the mass layoffs at Twitter after Musk's $44 billion acquisition in 2022. These weren't peripheral hires. They were the architecture of the company.
Meanwhile, xAI's merger into SpaceX is not a quiet corporate reshuffling. It's a consolidation of Musk's most powerful assets at exactly the moment SpaceX is eyeing public markets. The question of how xAI's valuation—and its talent gaps—will be presented to future IPO investors is not a small one.
Three Ways to Read the Exodus
For AI researchers and engineers: The departure of a pretraining lead mid-rebuild is a technical red flag. AI model development is not a relay race where one runner hands the baton cleanly to the next. Institutional knowledge about model architecture, training data decisions, and failure modes lives in people's heads. Losing that, during a declared "rebuild," compounds the risk.
For investors watching the SpaceX IPO: AI startup valuations are built as much on team credibility as on benchmarks. When the founding team vanishes, the story investors are buying changes. xAI without its co-founders is effectively a different company than the one that launched with fanfare in 2023—and that reframing will need to be priced in.
***For Musk's competitors—Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind:*** Talent doesn't disappear. Eleven co-founders and their networks are now on the market. The question of where Kroiss, Nordeen, and the others land—and whether they build something new—may turn out to be the more interesting follow-up story.
Authors
Related Articles
After two weeks of witnesses calling him a liar, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman testified in his own defense, claiming Elon Musk tried to kill the company twice.
Week two of Musk v. Altman revealed a 2017 power struggle over AGI control, a stormed-out Tesla painting, and a diary entry asking 'what will take me to $1B?
SpaceX plans to invest at least $55 billion in a Texas AI chip factory called Terafab, with total costs potentially reaching $119 billion. We break down what's real, what's at stake, and who wins or loses.
The Musk v. Altman trial in Oakland isn't just a contract dispute. It's become an unscripted window into how AI's most powerful figures actually operate—and who they think should control the technology's future.
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation