China Says It Can Weather the Storm. Can It?

While missiles fly over the Middle East, Beijing's economists are running the numbers — and they like what they see.

Justin Lin Yifu, dean of the Institute of New Structural Economics at Peking University and a former chief economist at the World Bank, said Thursday that China has sufficient capacity to absorb external shocks from the conflict in the Middle East and still meet its annual growth target. In the same breath, he noted that China is also preparing for the possibility that Washington might walk back existing trade deals.

That's two crises, managed simultaneously, with a calm face. Whether that calm is earned — or performed — is the more interesting question.

What Lin Actually Said

Lin was careful not to dismiss the conflict's global weight. "No country," he acknowledged, "can be spared from the economic impacts of the conflict in the Middle East." But his argument is that China's domestic policy toolkit — stimulus, industrial strategy, consumption-led growth — gives it enough buffer to keep the economy on track.

China has set a growth target of around 5% for 2025, a number that already looks ambitious given persistent deflationary pressure, a property sector that hasn't fully recovered, and youth unemployment that remains stubbornly high. Lin's assertion is that these headwinds are manageable — not that they don't exist.

The second signal in his remarks is arguably more consequential. By publicly flagging the possibility that Washington could renege on trade agreements, Lin is essentially acknowledging that Beijing is stress-testing its economic strategy against a scenario where the Trump administration escalates — not de-escalates — trade tensions. That's not pessimism. That's contingency planning made visible.

Why the Timing Matters

Lin's remarks land at a moment when global supply chains are absorbing shocks from multiple directions at once. Energy markets are jittery. Shipping lanes through the Middle East remain a pressure point. And the broader US-China relationship is operating under a level of strategic ambiguity that makes long-term business planning genuinely difficult.

Sponsored

Advertise with Us

[email protected]

Sponsored

For investors and policymakers watching from the outside, the question isn't just whether China can absorb these shocks — it's whether the absorption mechanism shifts costs elsewhere. When a large economy insulates itself through domestic policy, the adjustment often ripples outward: through commodity prices, currency movements, or shifts in trade flows that affect partners who have less cushion.

South Korea, Japan, and Southeast Asian economies that are deeply integrated into Chinese supply chains will be watching this closely. So will European manufacturers who've been navigating the dual pressure of US tariff threats and Chinese overcapacity in sectors like electric vehicles and solar panels.

The Case for Skepticism

Not everyone reads Lin's optimism at face value — and there are structural reasons to be cautious.

Lin is not a neutral observer. He's an economist with deep ties to Chinese policymaking, and his public statements often function as much as policy signals as they do as independent analysis. When he says China can absorb the shocks, he may be right — but he's also saying what Beijing wants markets to hear.

The structural vulnerabilities are real. China's property sector, once a primary engine of growth, is still working through a painful deleveraging. Consumer confidence has been slow to recover. And the deflationary dynamics that have worried analysts for the past two years haven't disappeared — they've just been partially offset by export surges in manufacturing.

There's also the question of what "absorbing shocks" actually means in practice. If it means redirecting investment, doubling down on state-backed industrial policy, and accepting lower short-term consumption — that's a very different kind of resilience than organic economic health.

The Geopolitical Subtext

China's position on the Middle East conflict is, like most things in its foreign policy, layered. Beijing needs stable energy supplies — it's the world's largest oil importer — and Middle East instability is a direct threat to that. At the same time, China has resisted aligning with US-led pressure on Iran, and it has economic relationships in the region that it's not willing to sacrifice for geopolitical solidarity with Washington.

This puts China in an uncomfortable position: wanting peace for economic reasons, but unwilling to pay the diplomatic price that Western powers are asking. The longer the conflict runs, the more that tension will show.