After Charlie Kirk's Death, Anti-Semitism Becomes a Weapon in America's Conservative Civil War

At the close of 2025, just months after Charlie Kirk's assassination, thousands gathered in Phoenix for AmericaFest expecting to honor his legacy. Instead, they witnessed something unprecedented: MAGA's leading lights publicly shivving each other on stage.

Ben Shapiro warned that "the conservative movement is in serious danger," lambasting right-wing "charlatans" and naming names. He slammed Tucker Carlson for mainstreaming pro-Nazi sentiment and dubbed Steve Bannon "a PR flack for Jeffrey Epstein." The next day, Bannon fired back from the same podium: "Ben Shapiro is like a cancer, and that cancer spreads."

What should have been a moment of conservative unity became a public autopsy of a movement eating itself alive.

The Kingmaker's Impossible Balance

Before his death, Kirk wasn't just debating college liberals—he was fighting a war within his own movement. For years, he'd been dogged by Nick Fuentes, a 22-year-old white nationalist who openly admired Hitler and blamed Jews for America's problems. Fuentes's followers, known as "Groypers," relentlessly heckled Kirk at events with anti-Semitic questions.

Kirk recognized this crude conspiracism as poison to his project of popularizing conservatism. "We succeed—we win; they blame the Jews," he explained to callers. But he also saw Fuentes's real appeal among disaffected youth, so he attempted a precarious balancing act: rebuking the Groypers while partially co-opting some talking points.

The tension was palpable. At Illinois State University last April, a man confronted Kirk claiming the U.S. government had been "infiltrated by the Jews." For 16 minutes, Kirk patiently deconstructed conspiracy theories before offering his alternative: "The people actually controlling our country are not 'the Jews'—it's a combination of people that want to see the United States cripple and fall." His questioner's emphatic response: "The Jews."

When the Center Cannot Hold

Kirk's death didn't just remove one man—it destabilized the entire Trump coalition by eliminating its most credible mediator. Without his charisma and credibility, the frantic scramble for MAGA's soul began, unleashing all the tensions he'd worked to contain.

Candace Owens, whom Kirk once hired and elevated from obscurity, began claiming he'd been murdered not by the detained suspect but by an Israeli conspiracy involving Kirk's own lieutenants—possibly even his wife, Erika Kirk, now Turning Point's CEO.

Carlson crossed the ultimate line seven weeks after Kirk's death by inviting Fuentes onto his show—perhaps the most popular podcast on the American right. Over 138 minutes, Fuentes praised Stalin and railed against "organized Jewry" while his host largely failed to challenge these Nazi-adjacent views.

Anti-Semitism as Political Strategy

This isn't just about Jews and Israel—it's a power struggle over who will define MAGA once Trump is gone. By painting rivals as tools of Jewish interests, hard-right influencers hope to delegitimize competition not by besting ideas, but by slurring loyalties.

Carlson has spent years assailing Shapiro, the country's most prominent Jewish conservative, casting him as "hostile toward White, Christian men" and questioning how someone "who doesn't care about America" could get an audience. Bannon regularly labels critics as "Israel-first," even in disputes unrelated to Israel.

Ironically, these anti-Semitic warriors hold no love for Trump himself. Carlson privately called the president "a total piece of shit" and a "demonic force." Bannon derided Trump in texts to Epstein. Fuentes refused to endorse Trump in 2024. Implying Trump is controlled by Israel or Jewish donors becomes a convenient wedge between him and his supporters.

The Collateral Damage of Extremism

The fallout has been swift and severe. Ted Cruz told the Federalist Society he'd seen "more anti-Semitism on the right than at any time in my life." Princeton professor Robert George, once dubbed "the reigning brain of the Christian right," resigned from the Heritage Foundation's board. Dozens of staffers reportedly left the organization.

Meanwhile, Kirk's broader coalition-building dream is crumbling. Polling from The New York Times found that "the major demographic shifts of the last election have snapped back"—young and nonwhite voters are even more likely to disapprove of Trump than before.