FTC Finalizes Ban on GM and OnStar Selling Driver Data to Insurance Brokers
The FTC has finalized an order banning GM and OnStar from sharing consumer driving data with brokers without explicit consent, following privacy scandals.
Your driving habits are no longer for sale. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) officially slammed the brakes on General Motors (GM) and its OnStar service, finalizing an order that bans them from sharing sensitive consumer data with reporting agencies without explicit consent.
The Fallout from the GM OnStar FTC Data Privacy Order
This final order follows a series of revelations that started nearly two years ago. A New York Times investigation exposed how GM's 'Smart Driver' program tracked precise geolocation and driving behaviors—like hard braking and speeding—and sold that intel to data brokers like LexisNexis and Verisk. These brokers then pitched the data to insurance companies, which often led to higher premiums for unsuspecting drivers.
The FTC alleged that GM used a misleading enrollment process, failing to tell customers their data was being monetized. Under the new rules, GM must get explicit opt-in consent before collecting or sharing any connected vehicle data. This process will now trigger at the dealership, linked directly to the vehicle's VIN number.
Compliance and Transparency Mandates
GM isn't just stopping the sales; they're overhauling their entire privacy infrastructure. The automaker discontinued the Smart Driver program in April 2024 and has already moved to simplify its privacy statements. Consumers now have the right to request a copy of their data, seek its deletion, and disable geolocation tracking entirely.
- Mandatory explicit consent for all data sharing.
- The right for consumers to access and delete stored data.
- Exceptions allowed for emergency responders and de-identified R&D.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
Harvard grad's AI-powered microphone jammer promises privacy protection but faces fierce technical skepticism. Why the debate reveals more than the device itself.
Grammarly's AI feature uses deceased academics and living experts without permission to provide writing advice, sparking privacy and consent concerns in the AI age.
Meta subcontractor employees in Kenya have been viewing sensitive footage captured by Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses for AI training. What does this mean for smart glasses privacy?
Investigation reveals Meta's AI glasses send intimate footage to human reviewers in Kenya, including bathroom visits and private moments. Privacy promise broken?
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation