Trump Greenland Pressure 2026: Europe’s Existential Crisis and the Fraying Alliance

He's shaking hands, but his eyes are on their land. One year into Donald Trump’s second term, Europe faces a reality far more disruptive than even the gloomiest analysts predicted. According to reports from the World Economic Forum, the US is using economic coercion to target the sovereign territory of a fellow NATO member, turning the unthinkable into a geopolitical crisis.

Trump Greenland Pressure 2026 and the NATO Standoff

At Davos on January 22, 2026, Trump explicitly ruled out using military force to acquire Greenland, a self-ruling territory of Denmark. However, he claimed to have established a "framework for a future deal" during talks with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. While Trump dropped proposed tariffs on eight European nations that assisted in Greenland, the fundamental uncertainty regarding the territory's sovereignty persists.

This standoff is an existential crisis for both the EU and NATO. Trump's determination to acquire Greenland "by hook or by crook" signals a departure from traditional diplomacy, treating strategic geography as a real estate transaction. Brussels remains shell-shocked as its strongest ally has pivoted to become a direct competitor.

The Price of Appeasement: EU’s Struggle with Tariffs

The US National Security Strategy released last month framed Europe's democratic failings as a greater risk than Russian aggression. This shift in perspective explains why the EU has largely opted for a policy of appeasement. Under a trade agreement signed in July 2025, the EU accepted a 15% tariff rate on exports to America without launching retaliatory measures.

Although the European Parliament hasn't ratified the deal, the bloc’s reluctance to fight back highlights its lack of leverage. Trump’s use of tariffs as a multipurpose tool for geopolitics has left Brussels scrambling to find a unified response to a more transactional Washington.