Washington Takes the Keys: The US Strategy for Venezuelan Oil Control 2026
As of Jan 2026, the US has declared indefinite control over Venezuela's oil sales following Maduro's capture. Explore the impact of US control of Venezuelan oil 2026 on the global market.
A president is gone, but the oil remains—and Washington is taking the keys. Following the abduction of Nicolas Maduro by US forces, the Trump administration's rapid moves to secure the world's largest oil reserves are reshaping the geopolitical landscape of Latin America.
US Control of Venezuelan Oil 2026: An Indefinite Takeover
On Wednesday, January 7, 2026, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright announced that the United States would control Venezuela's oil sales "indefinitely." According to officials, proceeds from these sales will be held in US Treasury accounts. While the money is slated to be shared with Caracas, the exact proportion remains undisclosed.
The announcement follows a $2 billion deal struck a day earlier, which involves the export of 30 to 50 million barrels of sanctioned crude to the US. While the Trump administration claims US oil companies are ready to invest billions, analysts warn that actual stability is still a long way off.
The Crisis of Social Spending
For the average Venezuelan, the macro-political shift translates into immediate anxiety. Tim Hunter of Oxford Economics notes that 78 percent of the national budget is earmarked for social spending. With the US holding the purse strings, any delay in fund disbursement could trigger widespread social unrest as prices for daily essentials soar.
The idea that the capture of Maduro will cause US oil companies to jump into Venezuela is also a myth until stability is clear.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
Pakistan military reports killing 92 militants in Balochistan after coordinated attacks killed 33 security personnel and civilians, marking one of deadliest days in decades-long insurgency.
As Trump threatens NATO, European leaders flock to Beijing. Is this strategic pivoting or anxious hedging? Inside Europe's scramble for leverage in a multipolar world.
Trump's second-term foreign policy blends realist power politics with departures from classical restraint. What does this mean for global stability?
President Trump's intervention led to a temporary halt in energy infrastructure attacks between Russia and Ukraine. But with ground fighting continuing and conflicting timelines, questions arise about the prospects for genuine peace talks.
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation