Chile’s Lithium Juggernaut: Codelco and SQM Join Forces to Control 40% of Global Reserves
Chile's Codelco and SQM have formed a giant joint venture to exploit lithium, controlling 40% of global reserves. A major move for the EV supply chain.
Chile's shaking up the 'white gold' market. The world's leading copper producer is now doubling down on its lithium dominance, creating a state-private hybrid that could dictate the future of electric vehicles.
The Birth of a Resource Powerhouse
On Saturday, December 27, 2025, Chile’s state-owned Codelco and the private mining firm SQM announced the creation of a massive joint venture. This new entity will oversee the exploitation of lithium, the lightweight metal essential for powering the EV revolution.
Leveraging 40% of Global Reserves
Chile isn't just another player; it's the world’s second-largest producer and holds a staggering 40% of the world's known lithium reserves. This partnership marks a pivotal shift in how these critical minerals are managed.
- State Control: Codelco ensures the Chilean government maintains a firm grip on national resources.
- Private Expertise: SQM brings technical proficiency and existing infrastructure to the table.
- Geopolitical Link: With Chinese capital embedded in SQM, the venture maintains a direct line to the world's largest EV market.
Authors
Related Articles
Samsung SDI and KG Mobility have signed an MOU to jointly develop advanced EV battery packs using next-generation 46-series cylindrical cells, signaling a deeper integration trend in the auto industry.
Cisco just posted record quarterly revenue and cut 4,000 jobs on the same day. It's not a contradiction — it's a template spreading across Big Tech.
AI sustainability researcher Sasha Luccioni is launching a new venture to push for energy transparency in AI. Here's why Big Tech keeps the numbers hidden—and what's starting to change.
Josh D'Amaro took over Disney with a bold Disney Plus vision. Days later, he's in a First Amendment fight with the Trump administration over The View. What does this mean for media freedom?
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation