Liabooks Home|PRISM News
EU Shuts Out China from €93B Research Program: The New Cold War in Science
PoliticsAI Analysis

EU Shuts Out China from €93B Research Program: The New Cold War in Science

3 min readSource

The EU has banned Chinese organizations from its €93 billion Horizon Europe program, reshaping global research collaboration. What does this mean for the future of international science?

The European Union has slammed the door on Chinese researchers, barring them from its €93 billionHorizon Europe program—the world's largest public research funding initiative. The move marks a dramatic shift from collaboration to competition in global science, with ripple effects that extend far beyond Brussels and Beijing.

From Partners to Pariahs: A Decade of Deteriorating Trust

Horizon Europe, launched in 2021, funds everything from AI breakthroughs to quantum computing advances across the continent. Until this year, Chinese institutions were welcome participants, contributing to joint research projects and sharing in the program's generous funding.

But that era is over. Citing "research security concerns" and fears of military applications, the EU has designated certain areas as off-limits to Chinese organizations. The decision reflects a broader souring of EU-China relations, accelerated by Beijing's military-civil fusion strategy, the Hong Kong crackdown, and China's ambiguous stance on the Ukraine war.

The irony? Just a decade ago, EU and Chinese researchers were collaborating enthusiastically on climate change solutions and medical breakthroughs. Today, they're increasingly viewed as strategic competitors rather than scientific partners.

Limited Impact or Strategic Miscalculation?

Here's where it gets interesting: experts in affected sectors suggest the ban's immediate impact may be surprisingly limited. Why? Because EU-China research collaboration in sensitive areas was already at historic lows.

"Chinese researchers have been pivoting to domestic programs anyway," explains one Brussels-based research policy analyst. "The application numbers were already dropping." China has indeed been pouring resources into its own National Natural Science Foundation, reducing its reliance on European funding.

Yet this narrative of minimal impact may be overly optimistic. In fields like semiconductors and biotechnology, where innovation depends on global talent pools and diverse perspectives, the exclusion could slow progress for everyone involved.

The Broader Realignment: Who Wins, Who Loses?

The EU's decision isn't happening in a vacuum. It's part of a global realignment where research collaboration increasingly follows geopolitical lines. The U.S. has been tightening restrictions on Chinese researchers for years, particularly in sensitive technologies.

For other countries, this creates both opportunities and dilemmas. South Korea, Japan, and India may find themselves courted more aggressively by European research institutions looking to fill the Chinese void. But they'll also face pressure to choose sides in what's becoming a bifurcated global research ecosystem.

Meanwhile, China isn't standing still. Beijing is doubling down on indigenous innovation, launching massive domestic research initiatives, and building alternative collaboration networks with countries in the Global South.

This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.

Thoughts

Related Articles