The Women Treblinka Forgot — Until Now

A survivor looked the interviewer in the eye and said, "There was no women." He was wrong — and he almost certainly knew it.

What Was Buried

On August 2, 1943, prisoners at Treblinka II — a Nazi extermination camp roughly 50 miles northeast of Warsaw — staged a long-planned revolt. They set fire to the camp. As many as 300 prisoners escaped, at least temporarily. It remains one of the most significant acts of resistance in Holocaust history.

For over 80 years, a crucial part of that story went untold.

Historian Chad S.A. Gibbs, in his 2026 book Survival at Treblinka, reveals that women prisoners — never more than about 40 at any time in a camp that processed over 900,000 Jewish deaths — were central to the uprising. Working as launderers, kitchen staff, and cleaners, they exploited the SS guards' contempt for them. Because the Germans didn't fear Jewish women, they didn't watch them closely. That indifference became a weapon.

Women cleaned SS barracks and tracked guard movements. They staffed kitchens and hid stolen supplies. And women held in a camp brothel — forced to endure sexual exploitation by guards and senior prisoners — managed to steal as many as eight rifles that armed the revolt.

The brothel's existence, and the women's act of resistance within it, had never appeared in any published history before Gibbs' book.

Why the Silence Lasted So Long

This isn't simply a story about forgotten history. It's a story about how history gets forgotten — and by whom.

A historian working in the 1970s had encountered the same evidence. Trial testimony pointed clearly to sexual exploitation at Treblinka. He quoted it — then cut it short. Gibbs doesn't condemn him outright. Some of the women who had been held in that brothel were still alive. Publishing what they had endured could have unraveled decades of painstaking reconstruction of their lives and identities. Silence, in that context, may have felt like protection.

But protection has a cost. Not writing about the brothel meant not writing about how those women armed the uprising. The compassion and the erasure were inseparable.

Sponsored

Advertise with Us

[email protected]

Sponsored

Male survivors compounded the silence. In a 1996 interview conducted by the USC Shoah Foundation, a male survivor of Treblinka was asked — a rare question for that era — whether he knew any women in the camp. His answer was unequivocal: "There was no women." Maps of the camp make clear that all male prisoners would have encountered women multiple times daily, especially at mealtimes. He knew. He chose not to say.

Gibbs doesn't flatten this into a simple accusation. The reasons were likely layered: shame at witnessing what they could not stop, an unwillingness to confront damage to their own sense of masculinity, and in some cases, possibly, a deeper culpability they couldn't face.

Then there was Adek Stein, a survivor from Białystok interviewed at his home in Australia in 1995. When asked about sexual violence, he began to speak — then stopped. He looked around the room at the young women present, presumably family members, and said he couldn't go on. It was "too drastic" to recount "in front of these girls." His interviewer urged him to continue. He changed the subject. Whatever he knew died with him.

Why Now

Gibbs argues that the timing of these revelations is not coincidental. As survivors pass away, the questions historians feel free to ask — and the constraints they feel obligated to honor — shift. The living women who endured Treblinka's brothel are gone. The ethical calculus has changed.

So has the field itself. Holocaust historiography, like most historical disciplines, has grown more diverse. Scholars focused on women's experiences, disability history, LGBTQ+ lives, and other long-marginalized perspectives are bringing new questions to old archives. The diversity of historians shapes the diversity of history.

What's striking is how much was always there, waiting. The evidence Gibbs draws on — trial testimony, survivor interviews, camp maps — was not newly discovered. It existed. It simply wasn't assembled, or wasn't asked about, or wasn't considered worth the discomfort of addressing.

This pattern extends well beyond the Holocaust. The history of wartime sexual violence — from the Pacific theater in World War II to conflicts in Bosnia, Rwanda, and beyond — has consistently lagged behind other historical narratives, for many of the same reasons: survivor shame, researcher avoidance, institutional reluctance, and a cultural tendency to treat sexual violence as a private wound rather than a historical fact.

What Gets Lost When We Look Away

The stakes here aren't merely academic. When women's agency at Treblinka goes unrecorded, the historical record doesn't just become incomplete — it becomes actively misleading. The standard narrative of Holocaust resistance has centered on male prisoners, male planners, male action. That narrative isn't wrong, exactly. It's just partial in ways that distort our understanding of how resistance actually worked.

The women of Treblinka didn't resist despite their exploitation. In some cases, they resisted through it — turning the guards' assumptions against them, using the spaces they were forced into as cover for something the SS never imagined possible.

That's a different story than the one we've been telling. And it only becomes visible when historians are willing to go where the discomfort is.

The broader question this raises for historical research is uncomfortable but necessary: how many other archives contain evidence that has been seen, noted, and quietly set aside? How many other historians made the same choice as the one who cut that quotation short in the 1970s — not out of malice, but out of a calculation about what the living could bear?

Distance from an event, Gibbs suggests, is sometimes what finally allows us to open those doors. That's a reason for some hope. It's also a reminder of what we lose in the meantime.