Liabooks Home|PRISM News
Toyota Stays on Top, But the Real Trade War Battle Just Began
EconomyAI Analysis

Toyota Stays on Top, But the Real Trade War Battle Just Began

4 min readSource1

Toyota maintained its global lead with 10.5M vehicles sold, but Trump's tariff policies are reshaping the auto industry. Hyundai's 19.5% profit drop shows the cost of import dependence as companies race to localize production.

10.5 million vehicles. That's how many cars Toyota sold globally in 2025, enough to keep its crown as the world's largest automaker. But behind this impressive number lies a tale of two very different strategies in navigating Trump's aggressive tariff regime.

While Toyota's sales grew 3.7% year-over-year, outpacing Volkswagen Group's9 million units and Hyundai Motor Group's7.27 million, the real story isn't about who sold the most cars. It's about who's best positioned for a world where trade wars have become the new normal.

Toyota's Tariff-Proof Strategy

Toyota's resilience came from a decision that seemed counterintuitive: absorb the pain rather than pass it on. When Trump initially slapped 25% tariffs on Japanese vehicles before reducing them to 15%, Toyota chose to eat the costs instead of raising prices across the board.

This strategy paid off spectacularly in the U.S., where Toyota and Lexus sales jumped 7.3% to 2.93 million units. The growth was driven by strong demand for hybrids like the Prius and RAV4 – vehicles that American consumers were willing to buy even in a tariff-heavy environment.

The key difference? Toyota produces about 80% of its U.S. sales domestically, making it far less vulnerable to import duties. This wasn't luck – it was the result of decades of strategic investment in American manufacturing that began in the 1980s.

Of course, this approach wasn't free. Toyota estimates that U.S. tariffs will cost it 1.45 trillion yen ($9.7 billion) in the fiscal year ending March 2026. But the company still raised its full-year operating profit forecast, banking on strong global demand and successful cost reductions.

Hyundai's Import Dependence Dilemma

Hyundai's story tells a different tale. While the South Korean automaker saw global revenue grow over 6% in 2025, its operating profit plummeted 19.5% from the previous year. The culprit? U.S. tariffs that cost the company 4.1 trillion won – nearly three times Toyota's burden relative to company size.

The fundamental issue is production footprint. Hyundai produces only about 40% of its U.S. sales domestically, compared to Toyota's 80%. This means 60% of Hyundai's American sales are still subject to import tariffs – a vulnerability that became painfully expensive in 2025.

The situation got worse on Monday when Trump threatened to raise tariffs back to 25%, claiming South Korea's legislature hadn't moved fast enough to implement their trade deal. Hyundai shares dropped nearly 5% on the news, highlighting how quickly political rhetoric can translate into market reality.

The Localization Race Accelerates

Both companies are now racing to expand U.S. manufacturing, but they're starting from very different positions. Hyundai aims to produce over 80% of its U.S. sales locally by 2030 through its Georgia facilities – a massive shift that will require billions in investment and years to complete.

Toyota, meanwhile, is doubling down on its existing advantage, focusing particularly on hybrid production as American consumers show growing interest in fuel-efficient vehicles. The company's U.S. manufacturing expansion isn't just about avoiding tariffs – it's about positioning for a market that increasingly values both efficiency and domestic production.

This localization push extends beyond just final assembly. Both companies are working to bring more of their supply chains onshore, recognizing that tariffs on components can be just as damaging as those on finished vehicles.

Beyond Numbers: A New Industrial Logic

What we're witnessing isn't just a temporary trade spat – it's the emergence of a new industrial logic where geopolitical considerations increasingly trump pure economic efficiency. The companies that thrive won't necessarily be those with the lowest costs, but those best adapted to a world of economic nationalism.

For investors, this shift creates both risks and opportunities. Companies with heavy import dependence face ongoing vulnerability to political decisions made thousands of miles away. But those investing early in localization may find themselves with sustainable competitive advantages as trade tensions persist.

The automotive industry's experience offers lessons for other sectors facing similar pressures. From semiconductors to pharmaceuticals, companies are grappling with how to balance global efficiency with local resilience.

This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.

Thoughts

1 thoughts

Related Articles