Sudan's New Civilian Roadmap: A Path to Peace or a Diplomatic Distraction?

A coalition of Sudanese civilian leaders has unveiled a new political roadmap in Nairobi, positioning itself as a “third pole” to end the country’s devastating war. But the initiative is already facing sharp questions about its legitimacy at home and its strategy abroad, with key international partners expressing skepticism.

On December 16, Sudanese political parties, armed movements, and civil society organizations signed a nine-point declaration in Kenya. Their stated goal: to forge an anti-war, pro-peace platform that reclaims political agency from the two military factions tearing the country apart—the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF).

The declaration brought together prominent figures, including former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, who led a transitional government before a 2021 coup, and, notably, Abdelwahid al-Nur, a longtime holdout from past political settlements. His participation was seen by some as a potential breakthrough.

Cracks in the Foundation

Despite the high-profile signatories, the initiative has been criticized for failing to represent a broader cross-section of Sudanese society. Sudanese researcher Hamid Khalafallah told Al Jazeera the coalition falls short.

Sponsored

Advertise with Us

[email protected]

Sponsored

Crucially, the grassroots resistance committees that were instrumental in toppling former President Omar al-Bashir in 2019 have not formally endorsed the declaration. This omission reinforces concerns that civilians on the ground are being politically instrumentalized rather than empowered.

The View from Europe: 'A Distraction'

International partners, whose support is vital, appear unconvinced. A senior European Union diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity, was blunt, telling Al Jazeera that Brussels does not see the Nairobi initiative as the foundation for a unified civilian process.

“We would like to see only one civilian process, that’s why we are helping the African Union [AU],” the source said. “Everything else is a distraction, like this Nairobi one.” The EU's priority, the official explained, is to consolidate civilian platforms under a single, AU-led framework rather than multiplying them.

A Question of Strategy

Analysts also question the declaration's strategic calculus. Cameron Hudson, a US-Africa policy expert, suggested the initiative appears designed more to attract international endorsement than to build genuine domestic consensus. “My sense is that the Nairobi declaration reverse engineers what the Quad has said,” he told Al Jazeera.

Hudson also warned that the approach mishandles the sequencing of Sudan’s transition by “prematurely” linking a ceasefire with complex political issues like military reform. “If what the Quad wants is an unconditional ceasefire, then it needs to pursue that, not create opportunities to trade a ceasefire for political assurances,” he argued.

This leaves international strategy tethered to an unresolved contradiction. Western powers insist that neither the SAF nor the RSF should have a political future. Yet both armed forces are indispensable to achieving any cessation of hostilities. Until this paradox is resolved, civilian-led initiatives like the Nairobi declaration will struggle to bridge the gap between political aspiration and military reality.