Gaza's Hollow Ceasefire: Bullets Still Fly After 4 Months

On Saturday, the third day of Ramadan, explosions echoed through Gaza's Jabalia refugee camp once again. Israeli airstrikes killed two Palestinians in what marked yet another breach of the "ceasefire" agreement signed with Hamas over four months ago. The bullets haven't stopped flying, even as the world speaks of peace.

The Mathematics of a Broken Truce

Since the ceasefire took effect, 614 Palestinians have died in Israeli attacks, with 1,640 more wounded, according to Palestinian news agency Wafa. That's an average of five deaths per day during what's supposed to be a period of peace. Israel's military justified Saturday's strikes, claiming they targeted fighters who "posed an immediate threat" after crossing demarcation lines. But the civilian toll keeps mounting.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump's Board of Peace held its inaugural meeting just two days earlier, unveiling ambitious plans for Gaza's future. Nine countries pledged $7 billion for reconstruction, with the US adding another $10 billion. Five nations agreed to contribute troops to a 20,000-strong International Stabilization Force (ISF).

Money Without Peace

Yet behind these impressive figures lies a more complex reality. The total cost to rebuild Gaza is estimated at $70 billion – making current pledges roughly one-quarter of what's actually needed. But the real obstacle isn't financial; it's political.

Benjamin Netanyahu insists Hamas must disarm before any reconstruction begins. His aides have reportedly prepared a 60-day ultimatum for the group to comply or face renewed war. Hamas has flatly rejected this demand, with spokesperson Hazem Qassem stating that disarmament talks can only begin "with the total halt of aggression."

This creates a classic chicken-and-egg problem: Israel won't rebuild until Hamas disarms, but Hamas won't disarm while Israel continues what it calls occupation.

Voices from the Ground

For Gaza's residents, the gap between international announcements and daily reality feels unbridgeable. Awad al-Ghoul, a 70-year-old displaced from southern Rafah and now living in a tent in az-Zawayda, puts it bluntly: "Israel kills, bombs, violates the ceasefire agreement daily and expands the buffer zone without anyone stopping it. So this project is a failure from the start and unclear in vision."

His words capture the deep skepticism of people who've lived through decades of failed peace processes. They've heard grand promises before, only to watch them crumble under the weight of political reality.

The Peacekeeping Paradox

Hamas has signaled conditional acceptance of peacekeeping forces, but with crucial caveats. They want troops that "monitor the ceasefire, ensure its implementation, and act as a buffer between the occupation army and our people" – but without interfering in Gaza's internal affairs.

This raises fundamental questions about the peacekeepers' mandate. Will they be neutral observers or active enforcers of Israeli security demands? The distinction could determine whether the ISF becomes a bridge to peace or another source of conflict.

The Bigger Picture

Gaza's situation reflects broader challenges facing international peacekeeping in the 21st century. Traditional models assume warring parties genuinely want peace and need only external support to maintain it. But what happens when the conflict's root causes remain unresolved?

The international community is essentially betting that economic incentives and military presence can override decades of mutual distrust and competing national narratives. It's a high-stakes experiment in whether peace can be imposed from outside rather than built from within.