EU's 'Made in Europe' Plan Backfires on Allies

The European Union's ambitious "Made in Europe" plan has hit an unexpected snag: it's alienating the very allies it should be courting. Honda and Toyota, along with British automakers, are sounding alarms that Brussels' new local content requirements could lock them out of a market they've invested in for decades.

When Protectionism Goes Sideways

Stephane Sejourne, the European Commission's Executive Vice-President spearheading this initiative, positioned it as a shield against cheap Chinese imports. The logic seemed straightforward: boost local content requirements, protect European manufacturing, win.

But trade policy is rarely that simple. The same rules designed to keep out Chinese competitors are now threatening companies that have been European partners for generations. These aren't fly-by-night operations—Honda has been manufacturing in Europe since the 1980s, Toyota since the 1990s.

The Unintended Casualties

Consider the irony: Japanese automakers who moved production to Europe to avoid trade friction decades ago now face new barriers from the same continent. They've created thousands of European jobs, transferred technology, and built supply chains that span the continent.

Yet under the new framework, their existing European operations might not qualify as "European enough." The devil, as always, is in the details of what constitutes local content. Is a car assembled in Germany with Japanese-designed components and Korean batteries truly "Made in Europe"?

Beyond Cars: A Broader Warning

This automotive friction signals a larger shift in how the EU views global integration. The bloc is increasingly willing to sacrifice some economic efficiency for strategic autonomy—a reasonable goal, but one that comes with real costs.

British manufacturers, already dealing with Brexit complications, face another layer of complexity. For them, the "Made in Europe" requirements feel like a double punishment: first excluded from seamless EU access, now potentially blocked by content rules.

The question isn't whether Europe should protect its industries—it should. The question is whether it can do so without fragmenting the very coalition it needs to succeed.