Palestinian Journalist Regains TikTok Account—But at What Cost?

A 1.4 million-follower journalist gets her TikTok account back in 24 hours. Sounds like a victory for press freedom, right? Not quite.

The Quick Reversal That Wasn't Really a Win

Bisan Owda, the Emmy-winning Palestinian journalist who documented Gaza's war with her signature greeting "It's Bisan from Gaza—and I'm still alive," had her TikTok account restored Thursday after international outcry. But the platform quietly delivered a different kind of punishment: her content is now "ineligible for recommendation."

To find her account, users must type her full username. No more search suggestions. No more algorithmic discovery. Her voice remains, but it's been effectively muffled.

The New Face of Censorship

This isn't your grandfather's censorship. Instead of banning content outright—which creates martyrs and backlash—platforms now use algorithmic suppression. It's censorship with plausible deniability.

TikTok told The New Arab that Owda's account was "temporarily restricted" in September due to "impersonation risk concerns." But why did this concern suddenly surface right after the platform changed hands in the US? And why does the "solution" involve shadow-banning her content?

The timing is particularly striking. Owda's account disappeared just as TikTok completed its deal with US investment firms, some linked to President Trump. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—facing war crimes allegations—had previously expressed hope that TikTok's purchase would "go through, because it can be consequential."

The Broader Pattern

Owda's case fits a troubling pattern. While Israel continues to block foreign journalists from independently reporting in Gaza—with its supreme court again postponing a decision on press access—digital platforms simultaneously limit Palestinian voices online.

Since October 2023, at least 207 Palestinian journalists have been killed in Gaza, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. The "vast majority" were killed by Israeli forces. Last week alone, three more Palestinian journalists died in Israeli strikes, even during the ceasefire.

When physical access is blocked and journalists are killed, social media becomes crucial for getting stories out. That makes algorithmic suppression even more consequential.

The Algorithm as Editor-in-Chief

Social media platforms have become the world's most powerful news editors, deciding what billions see and don't see. But unlike traditional editors, their decisions happen in black boxes, guided by opaque algorithms and business considerations.

For young audiences especially, TikTok isn't just entertainment—it's a primary news source. When the platform decides to suppress content, it's not just affecting one journalist's reach; it's shaping public understanding of major global events.

The platform's explanation—"impersonation risk"—raises more questions than it answers. Owda has been a verified, award-winning journalist for years. What suddenly made her account suspicious? And why does the "fix" involve permanent algorithmic penalties?

The Geopolitical Stakes

This isn't happening in a vacuum. As TikTok navigates new ownership structures and regulatory pressures, it faces competing demands from different governments and interest groups. The platform must balance US political concerns, advertiser preferences, and international pressure—all while maintaining the appearance of neutrality.

But neutrality itself is a political choice. When platforms suppress voices from conflict zones, they're not staying neutral—they're amplifying the perspectives of those with better access to traditional media and political power.