US Court: Trump's Use of 1798 Law to Deport Venezuelans Violated Due Process

A U.S. federal judge has ruled that the government denied due process to a group of Venezuelan men by deporting them to a prison in El Salvador. The ruling, delivered by Judge James Boasberg, directly challenges the Trump administration's use of a centuries-old statute, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, as the legal basis for the removal.

The Heart of the Ruling: Due Process Denied

According to Judge Boasberg's finding, the core issue was the failure of the U.S. government to provide the men with the fundamental legal protections guaranteed under the Constitution. By deporting them directly to a third-country prison system—not their country of origin—without a proper hearing or legal recourse, the government's action was deemed a violation of their due process rights. This judicial check scrutinizes not just the outcome but the controversial method used to achieve it.

A Law from Another Century

The invocation of the Alien Enemies Act is central to the case. This statute grants the president broad authority during a declared war or invasion to detain and deport non-citizens from a hostile nation. The Trump administration's decision to apply this law to Venezuelan nationals, with whom the U.S. is not at war, represents a legally contentious expansion of executive power that the court has now pushed back against.

The Geopolitical Angle: Why El Salvador?

The decision to deport Venezuelan nationals to El Salvador—a country known for its notoriously harsh prison conditions under President Nayib Bukele—rather than their home country, adds a complex layer to the case. This practice, sometimes referred to as 'third-country deportation', signals a departure from standard international protocol and raises questions about bilateral agreements that may have facilitated such a transfer, bypassing both domestic legal safeguards and international asylum norms.