Europe's Strategic Autonomy Gamble: Can It Compete Without America?

€200,000 to €500,000. That's what a small European business must spend just to navigate compliance requirements for deploying a single "high-risk" AI system under EU regulations. This staggering figure captures Europe's fundamental dilemma: pursuing innovation while strangling it with red tape.

Munich's Wake-Up Call

At this year's Munich Security Conference, European officials barely flinched. When US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described America as eternally "the child of Europe," most in the audience understood the subtext: "You're on your own now, Granny."

The difference between Rubio's diplomatic phrasing and Vice President J.D. Vance's blunt remarks last year is merely syntactic. "Nobody doubts the good old days are over and we need to look after ourselves," one European diplomat observed. "Rubio and Vance are, in fact, saying the same thing."

The message couldn't be clearer: the era of American security guarantees and economic partnership on Europe's terms has ended.

The Competitiveness Crisis

Across Munich, Berlin, and Brussels, officials and experts I spoke with agree on two urgent imperatives: Europe must regain its competitiveness and achieve strategic autonomy. The consensus is sobering—Europe now lags behind both the United States and China, particularly in technology and advanced manufacturing.

Without reclaiming its competitive edge, the continent faces the prospect of entering major-power negotiations from a position of weakness. That's a luxury Europe can no longer afford in an increasingly multipolar world.

The EU still excels in basic research and innovation, but it remains painfully slow to translate breakthroughs into market-ready products. This innovation gap isn't just about lost profits—it's about strategic vulnerability.

The Regulatory Straightjacket

Part of the problem stems from well-documented overregulation. The EU AI Act exemplifies this challenge: deploying an AI system classified as "high risk" costs small and medium businesses €200,000 to €500,000 just for compliance processes, before any actual development begins.

Market fragmentation compounds the challenge. Legal frameworks, tax regimes, and business practices vary significantly across the 27 member states, preventing European tech firms from scaling as rapidly as their American and Chinese counterparts.

While Google or Baidu can test products across unified markets, European startups must navigate a patchwork of national regulations from day one. It's like forcing a sprinter to run hurdles while competitors get a clear track.

What Strategic Autonomy Really Means

Europe's push for "strategic autonomy" isn't just about reducing dependence on America. It's about building indigenous capabilities to counter China's economic influence and Russia's security threats while maintaining European values around privacy, competition, and social welfare.

But this path demands difficult trade-offs. Increased defense spending means less money for social programs. Regulatory streamlining could weaken Europe's cherished consumer protections. And time is running short—China has already captured key supply chains in electric vehicles, solar panels, and batteries, while America dominates semiconductors and AI.

The Innovation Paradox

Europe's dilemma runs deeper than regulation. The continent's post-war project prioritized peace, integration, and social cohesion over raw economic competition. These values created prosperity and stability, but they also fostered a risk-averse culture that struggles with the creative destruction necessary for technological leadership.

Can Europe maintain its social model while competing with America's venture capital dynamism and China's state-directed innovation? The answer will determine whether strategic autonomy becomes genuine independence or expensive isolation.