Trump Cuba Venezuela Oil Deal 2026: Squeezing the Island into a Corner
President Trump declares a total cutoff of Venezuelan oil to Cuba. Analyze the impact of the Trump Cuba Venezuela oil deal 2026 and the escalating geopolitical tension in the Caribbean.
"There will be no more oil or money going to Cuba—ZERO!" President Donald Trump issued a blunt ultimatum on January 11, 2026. According to Reuters, the U.S. administration is cutting off the Venezuelan oil lifeline that has sustained the communist-run island for decades, demanding Havana strike a new deal with Washington before the situation worsens.
Trump Cuba Venezuela Oil Deal 2026: Severing the Lifeline
The announcement follows the dramatic capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by U.S. forces in early January. Since then, shipping data shows that not a single cargo of oil has left Venezuelan ports for Cuba. Instead, Washington is finalizing a $2 billion agreement with interim President Delcy Rodriguez to supply 50 million barrels of oil directly to the U.S., with proceeds kept in Treasury-supervised accounts.
Defiance Amidst the Darkness
Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel rejected the threat, calling Cuba a "free, independent, and sovereign nation." However, the impact on the ground is severe. Last year, Venezuela provided roughly 26,500 barrels per day to Cuba, covering 50% of the island's oil deficit. Without this supply, blackouts have become the norm, even in the capital city of Havana.
While Mexico has emerged as a critical alternative, its volumes remain insufficient to fill the gap. U.S. intelligence suggests that while the Cuban economy is severely strained, there is no definitive proof yet that the government is "ready to fall," despite the hardening rhetoric from officials like Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
Pakistan military reports killing 92 militants in Balochistan after coordinated attacks killed 33 security personnel and civilians, marking one of deadliest days in decades-long insurgency.
As Trump threatens NATO, European leaders flock to Beijing. Is this strategic pivoting or anxious hedging? Inside Europe's scramble for leverage in a multipolar world.
Trump's second-term foreign policy blends realist power politics with departures from classical restraint. What does this mean for global stability?
President Trump's intervention led to a temporary halt in energy infrastructure attacks between Russia and Ukraine. But with ground fighting continuing and conflicting timelines, questions arise about the prospects for genuine peace talks.
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation