Committee of 100 Paul Cheung 2025: Navigating the US-China Divide
Paul Cheung takes the helm of the Committee of 100 in 2025. Discover his strategy for US-China relations and addressing anti-Asian hate.
They've shaken hands, but their fists remain clenched. As the geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China intensifies, a pivotal shift in leadership is taking place within the diaspora community. Paul Cheung was recently named president of the Committee of 100, stepping into the spotlight at a critical juncture for bilateral relations.
Committee of 100 Paul Cheung and the 2025 Strategy
In an exclusive 'Open Questions' interview, Cheung laid out his vision for the non-profit organization. He's focusing on two main pillars: combating the rise of anti-Asian hate in the U.S. and bridging the communication gap between the world's two largest economic powers. Since its founding in 1989, the Committee of 100 has served as a powerful collective of influential Chinese-Americans from business, government, and the arts.
Addressing Hate and Geopolitical Tension
Cheung's leadership comes as the community faces unprecedented scrutiny. The rise in anti-Asian sentiment isn't just a social issue; it's deeply intertwined with the Washington-Beijing friction. The organization aims to ensure that Chinese-Americans aren't caught in the crossfire of national security debates, advocating for policies that promote inclusion while facilitating constructive bilateral exchanges.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
Pakistan military reports killing 92 militants in Balochistan after coordinated attacks killed 33 security personnel and civilians, marking one of deadliest days in decades-long insurgency.
UCLA researcher Xia Xian's move to Wuhan University highlights growing US-China tensions in scientific collaboration and the politicization of virus research.
As Trump threatens NATO, European leaders flock to Beijing. Is this strategic pivoting or anxious hedging? Inside Europe's scramble for leverage in a multipolar world.
Trump's second-term foreign policy blends realist power politics with departures from classical restraint. What does this mean for global stability?
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation