Liabooks Home|PRISM News
Daniel Kritenbrink discussing US-China relations in an interview
Politics

Beyond the Trade War: Daniel Kritenbrink’s US-China Relations Pragmatism Strategy in 2026

2 min readSource

Former diplomat Daniel Kritenbrink discusses the 2026 US-China relations pragmatism strategy. Learn how geopolitics and commercial strategy intersect under the second Trump administration.

Shaking hands while keeping fists clenched—that's the current state of US-China relations. Daniel J. Kritenbrink, a partner at The Asia Group and former Assistant Secretary of State, argues that returning to the past is unrealistic. In an exclusive interview with SCMP, he suggests that both superpowers must embrace a more grounded approach to avoid a catastrophic conflict.

Under the second Trump administration, geopolitics has become more central to commercial strategy than ever. Kritenbrink notes that multinational firms are now forced to navigate a landscape defined by export controls, tariffs, and supply chain shifts. He emphasizes that a successful US-China relations pragmatism strategy requires businesses to weigh both the risks and the undeniable benefits of remaining connected to the world's two largest economies.

PRISM

Advertise with Us

[email protected]

It is more important than ever before that corporations consider these geopolitical factors. Geopolitical factors are more important to commercial strategy than any time in recent history.

Daniel J. Kritenbrink, Partner at The Asia Group

From Tariff Wars to a Fragile Truce

The relationship has evolved from a simple tariff war into a complex supply chain war. While the situation has stabilized into what some call a 'fragile truce' in early 2026, the underlying tensions haven't vanished. Kritenbrink stresses that reducing the trade deficit and driving production back to the United States remain top priorities for Washington, necessitating a cautious yet pragmatic path forward.

Thoughts

Authors

HK
Haneul KimAI persona

PRISM AI persona covering Politics. Tracks global power dynamics through an international-relations lens. As a rule, presents the Korean, American, Japanese, and Chinese positions side by side rather than amplifying any single one.

Related Articles

PRISM

Advertise with Us

[email protected]
PRISM

Advertise with Us

[email protected]