Moulton Bill Explained: Congress Moves to Block Trump Administration Funds for Military Action in Venezuela
Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton has introduced a bill to block the Trump administration from using federal funds for military action in Venezuela, reigniting the U.S. debate on presidential war powers.
In a direct challenge to presidential authority, Democratic Congressman Seth Moulton of Massachusetts has introduced legislation aimed at preventing the Trump administration from using federal funds for military action against Venezuela. The move, announced on December 23, 2025, escalates the ongoing debate over war powers between the White House and Congress.
A Legislative Check on Executive Power
According to NPR, which spoke with the congressman, the bill explicitly seeks to prohibit the use of federal dollars to "wage war with Venezuela." This legislative strategy leverages one of Congress's most significant constitutional powers—the power of the purse. By controlling federal spending, lawmakers aim to create a legal barrier against any potential military intervention that has not received their explicit authorization.
For context, relations between the United States and Venezuela have been strained for years, marked by diplomatic tensions, economic sanctions, and differing political ideologies. This bill arises from concerns within some U.S. political circles about the potential for these tensions to escalate into armed conflict.
The Broader War Powers Debate
This move is not occurring in a vacuum. It taps into a long-standing constitutional debate in the U.S. over the separation of powers. While the President serves as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war. Congressman Moulton's bill represents an attempt by the legislative branch to reassert this authority and place a preemptive check on the executive's ability to initiate military hostilities independently.
The bill's passage is uncertain and will likely face significant political opposition. However, its introduction alone serves as a powerful political statement and a clear signal from a faction within the Democratic Party regarding the limits of presidential power in foreign policy.
This legislation is less about Venezuela itself and more a litmus test for congressional relevance in 21st-century foreign policy. If successful, it could establish a modern precedent for lawmakers to preemptively restrict military options in other global hotspots, potentially shifting the balance of power from the White House back to Capitol Hill.
본 콘텐츠는 AI가 원문 기사를 기반으로 요약 및 분석한 것입니다. 정확성을 위해 노력하지만 오류가 있을 수 있으며, 원문 확인을 권장합니다.
관련 기사
이스라엘의 '가자 영구 주둔' 선언부터 러시아의 우크라이나 공습까지, 전 세계적으로 강경 발언과 비타협적 태도가 확산하며 외교적 해법의 공간이 축소되고 있다.
미국 CBS 뉴스가 트럼프 행정부의 이민자 추방과 연관된 엘살바도르 교도소 고발 보도를 방영 직전 취소해 '정치적 검열' 논란에 휩싸였다. 모기업의 인수합병을 앞두고 행정부 압력에 굴복했다는 비판이 거세다.
미국 무역대표부(USTR)가 중국의 반도체 정책을 '불공정하고 차별적'이라 공식 판정하고, 18개월 후 인상되는 '0% 유예 관세' 조치를 발표했다. 이는 미중 기술 패권 경쟁의 새로운 압박 카드로 분석된다.
가자 지구 보건부, 이스라엘의 의료품 봉쇄로 보건 시스템이 전례 없는 붕괴 직전에 처했다고 경고. 수술용품, 의약품 부족으로 수천 명이 사망 위기에 놓였으며, 2만 명의 환자가 해외 치료를 기다리고 있다.