Moulton Bill Explained: Congress Moves to Block Trump Administration Funds for Military Action in Venezuela
Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton has introduced a bill to block the Trump administration from using federal funds for military action in Venezuela, reigniting the U.S. debate on presidential war powers.
In a direct challenge to presidential authority, Democratic Congressman Seth Moulton of Massachusetts has introduced legislation aimed at preventing the Trump administration from using federal funds for military action against Venezuela. The move, announced on December 23, 2025, escalates the ongoing debate over war powers between the White House and Congress.
A Legislative Check on Executive Power
According to NPR, which spoke with the congressman, the bill explicitly seeks to prohibit the use of federal dollars to "wage war with Venezuela." This legislative strategy leverages one of Congress's most significant constitutional powers—the power of the purse. By controlling federal spending, lawmakers aim to create a legal barrier against any potential military intervention that has not received their explicit authorization.
For context, relations between the United States and Venezuela have been strained for years, marked by diplomatic tensions, economic sanctions, and differing political ideologies. This bill arises from concerns within some U.S. political circles about the potential for these tensions to escalate into armed conflict.
The Broader War Powers Debate
This move is not occurring in a vacuum. It taps into a long-standing constitutional debate in the U.S. over the separation of powers. While the President serves as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war. Congressman Moulton's bill represents an attempt by the legislative branch to reassert this authority and place a preemptive check on the executive's ability to initiate military hostilities independently.
The bill's passage is uncertain and will likely face significant political opposition. However, its introduction alone serves as a powerful political statement and a clear signal from a faction within the Democratic Party regarding the limits of presidential power in foreign policy.
This legislation is less about Venezuela itself and more a litmus test for congressional relevance in 21st-century foreign policy. If successful, it could establish a modern precedent for lawmakers to preemptively restrict military options in other global hotspots, potentially shifting the balance of power from the White House back to Capitol Hill.
本コンテンツはAIが原文記事を基に要約・分析したものです。正確性に努めていますが、誤りがある可能性があります。原文の確認をお勧めします。
関連記事
ロシアによるウクライナへのミサイル攻撃、イスラエル国防相のガザに関する強硬発言など、世界各地で地政学的緊張が高まっています。シリアや南米でも対立が続く現状を解説します。
CBSニュースの人気番組「60ミニッツ」が、トランプ政権が移民を送還したエルサルバドルの刑務所に関する特集を放送直前に中止。社内外から「政権への忖度」との批判が噴出している。新経営陣の意向が働いたのか、報道の自由が問われる事態に。
米国通商代表部（USTR）は、中国の半導体産業政策が不公正であるとし、新たな関税措置を発表しました。当初の税率は0%ですが、2027年6月には引き上げられる予定です。
ガザ地区の保健省は、イスラエルの封鎖により医療システムが崩壊寸前だと警告。医薬品の4分の3が不足し、2万人の患者が治療を待つ中、死者も出ています。人道危機の現状を詳しく解説します。