South Korean Ruling Party Pushes for Special Insurrection Tribunal, Opposition Launches Filibuster
On Dec. 22, 2025, South Korea's ruling Democratic Party introduced a bill for a special insurrection tribunal, prompting the opposition PPP to launch a filibuster in a major clash over judicial independence.
SEOUL, South Korea – South Korea’s ruling Democratic Party (DP) on Monday introduced a contentious bill to establish a special tribunal for insurrection cases, specifically targeting those linked to former President Yoon Suk Yeol's failed martial law bid. The move immediately triggered a filibuster from the main opposition People Power Party (PPP), escalating a high-stakes political showdown over judicial independence.
The DP has championed the tribunal, citing what it calls unacceptable delays and a lack of fairness in the ongoing trials of officials implicated in the martial law case. However, the proposal has drawn sharp criticism that it may be unconstitutional and could severely undermine the judiciary's authority.
In a direct challenge, the PPP launched a filibuster to block the bill's passage. PPP leader Rep. Jang Dong-heok took the floor, accusing the DP of a blatant power grab. "The ruling party is seeking to create court benches made up of judges it favors in an attempt to take control over the judiciary," he declared.
How a Filibuster Works in South KoreaA filibuster is a procedural tactic used to delay or block a vote on a bill by holding the floor for an extended period. Under the National Assembly Act, it can be forcibly ended after 24 hours if at least three-fifths of all parliament members (180 lawmakers) vote to do so.
The proposed bill calls for establishing at least two special benches each at the Seoul Central District Court and the Seoul High Court to handle cases of insurrection, treason, and rebellion. In a concession to critics, the final version of the bill stipulates that judges will be selected by a body under Supreme Court guidelines, not a recommendation committee as initially planned. The bill also dropped a controversial clause that would have restricted presidential pardons for those convicted of insurrection.
Importantly, ongoing trials, including that of former President Yoon on charges of leading an insurrection, would continue to be handled by their existing benches.
"The judiciary itself has voiced strong opposition. Last week, the Supreme Court announced it would independently install its own special panels for such cases, a move widely seen as an alternative to the DP’s legislative plan."
With a comfortable parliamentary majority, the DP plans to wait out the 24-hour filibuster period and then use its numbers to end the debate and pass the bill. The confrontation comes as Yoon and several former high-ranking officials, including former Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun, are currently on trial. The outcome of this legislative battle could have profound implications for the country's political and judicial landscape.
関連記事
韓国防衛事業庁は、7兆ウォン規模の次期国産駆逐艦6隻の建造事業について、制限付き入札方式で造船会社を選定すると発表しました。造船大手間の法的紛争で停滞していた計画が、ついに前進します。
米国の情報提供を受け、中国が麻薬関連の資金洗浄事件で2名を起訴・判決したと国営メディアが報じました。緊張が続く米中関係の中で、この異例の司法協力が示す意味を解説します。
JD・バンス米副大統領は、物議を醸す「ターニングポイント会議」にて、保守運動を定義する唯一の基準は「愛国心」であると示唆。この発言が意味するものと、今後の運動の方向性を分析します。
スイスの裁判所がセメント大手ホルシムに対する気候変動訴訟を初めて受理。海面上昇に苦しむインドネシア住民の訴えが、企業の気候責任を問う歴史的な裁判となる可能性があります。