Liabooks Home|PRISM News
Immortality as a Subscription Service: Who Gets to Live Forever?
EconomyAI Analysis

Immortality as a Subscription Service: Who Gets to Live Forever?

3 min readSource

Life extension technologies are becoming exclusive to the wealthy, raising profound questions about inequality and the commodification of human longevity.

The quest for eternal life has moved from mythology to the marketplace. What was once the domain of gods and alchemists is now being packaged as a premium service, complete with subscription tiers and exclusive access for those who can afford it.

The Price Tag on Time

Silicon Valley billionaires are already spending millions annually on life extension treatments. Companies like Altos Labs, backed by Jeff Bezos, and Calico, Google's anti-aging venture, have raised billions in funding to develop technologies that promise to reverse human aging. These aren't one-time treatments—they require ongoing, expensive interventions that function more like Netflix subscriptions than traditional medicine.

The entry point is staggering. Basic longevity treatments start at $10,000 per month, while cutting-edge therapies can cost over $1 million annually. Unity Biotechnology's senolytic drugs, which target aging cells, are priced well beyond the reach of average consumers. Meanwhile, Methuselah Foundation and similar organizations continue to push the boundaries of what's scientifically possible.

This isn't just about healthcare—it's about fundamentally altering the human experience. When life extension becomes a luxury good, we're not just talking about better quality of life for the wealthy; we're talking about dramatically longer lifespans that could span centuries.

A New Biological Caste System

The implications extend far beyond individual choice. If the wealthy can live 200+ years while accumulating wealth and power, while the average person remains limited to a 80-year lifespan, we're looking at the emergence of a biological aristocracy.

This isn't hyperbole. Henry Greely, a bioethicist at Stanford, warns that "if life extension technologies remain exclusive to the wealthy, humanity could literally split into different species over time." The wealthy would have generations to compound their advantages—financially, socially, and politically.

Consider the career implications alone. If your boss has had 150 years to build expertise and networks while you're constrained to a traditional lifespan, how do you compete? The concept of retirement, inheritance, and even democracy itself would need fundamental restructuring.

The Regulatory Dilemma

Governments face an unprecedented challenge. How do you regulate technologies that could fundamentally alter human society? The FDA and European Medicines Agency are struggling with approval processes for treatments that don't just cure disease but enhance human capability.

Some propose treating longevity treatments like public utilities—ensuring basic life extension is available to all through national health systems. But the costs would be astronomical. Others suggest mandatory licensing that requires companies to provide affordable versions of their treatments, similar to generic drug requirements.

The World Health Organization is beginning to grapple with these questions, but international coordination remains elusive. What happens when some countries embrace enhancement while others restrict it?

This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.

Thoughts

Related Articles