Trump Threatens to Cut Iraq Support Over Maliki's Return

President Donald Trump just delivered his bluntest warning yet to a foreign nation: choose the wrong leader, and America walks away. His target? Iraq's potential selection of Nouri al-Maliki, a former prime minister with deep ties to Iran.

The Ultimatum

"Last time Maliki was in power, the Country descended into poverty and total chaos," Trump wrote on Truth Social Tuesday. "That should not be allowed to happen again."

The threat was stark and personal. "Because of his insane policies and ideologies, if elected, the United States of America will no longer help Iraq," Trump declared. "If we are not there to help, Iraq has ZERO chance of Success, Prosperity, or Freedom."

He concluded with a twist on his campaign slogan: "MAKE IRAQ GREAT AGAIN!"

The timing wasn't coincidental. Just days earlier, Iraq's largest Shia bloc, the Coordination Framework, had nominated al-Maliki as their candidate for prime minister. The 75-year-old politician, who led Iraq from 2006 to 2014, stepped down after ISIS seized large swaths of the country but has remained an influential power broker with close ties to Iran-backed factions.

America's Economic Leverage

Trump's threats aren't empty posturing. The US holds significant leverage over Iraq through a post-invasion arrangement that keeps most of Iraq's oil export revenues at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York. This financial lifeline, established after the 2003 US invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein, gives Washington considerable influence over Iraq's economic survival.

Reuters reported that the US has already threatened senior Iraqi politicians with sanctions should Iran-backed armed groups be included in the next government. American representatives made their position clear in a letter: while Iraq can choose its own prime minister, "the United States will make its own sovereign decisions regarding the next government in line with American interests."

Iraq's Impossible Balance

For Iraq, this represents an intensification of an impossible balancing act. The country has long walked a tightrope between its two most important allies: Washington, which provides security guarantees and economic support, and Tehran, with which it shares religious, cultural, and geographical ties.

Al-Maliki, a senior figure in the Shia Islamist Dawa Party, embodies this dilemma. His previous tenure was marked by power struggles with Sunni and Kurdish rivals and growing tensions with the US. Yet he's maintained close relationships with Iran-backed factions, making him a lightning rod for American concerns about Iranian influence in Iraqi politics.

The Broader Implications

Trump's intervention represents perhaps the most direct American interference in another country's democratic process since his return to office. The use of his campaign slogan for Iraq signals how he views American influence abroad – as an extension of his domestic political brand.

This isn't just about Iraq. It's a signal to Iran and other regional powers about how far the Trump administration is willing to go to counter Iranian influence in the Middle East. The question is whether such heavy-handed tactics will achieve their intended goals or backfire by pushing Iraq closer to Iran.