Can Taiwan's First Homegrown Submarine Change the Game Against China?
Taiwan's first indigenous submarine Hai Kun begins sea trials amid frozen defense budgets and rising Chinese pressure. Will asymmetric naval power shift the balance?
Can one submarine alter the balance of power in one of the world's most volatile waterways? Taiwan's first indigenously built submarine, the Hai Kun, has been conducting shallow-water dive tests over the past two weeks, marking a crucial milestone in the island's quest for naval deterrence against Beijing.
Two Decades in the Making
The Hai Kun – meaning "Sea Whale" – represents the centerpiece of Taiwan's Indigenous Defense Submarine (IDS) program, designed to boost asymmetric naval capabilities as Chinese military pressure intensifies. But the path to the water hasn't been smooth.
Originally scheduled for navy delivery in November 2025, the submarine missed its deadline after undersea trials and weapons testing fell behind. The delay prompted opposition lawmakers to freeze NT$1.8 billion ($56 million) in funding for follow-on submarines – part of a broader NT$284 billion program to build seven additional subs.
Facing mounting political pressure, manufacturer CSBC Corp conducted the first submerged test on January 29, followed by three more shallow-water trials. The company released its first official video of all four tests on Sunday, offering a glimpse of Taiwan's naval ambitions beneath the waves.
David's Slingshot Strategy
The submarine program reflects Taiwan's broader strategic reality: outgunned but not outmaneuvered. With China's navy boasting over 70 submarines compared to Taiwan's aging fleet of four (two 1980s-era Dutch boats and two 1940s-era American vessels), the island has turned to asymmetric warfare as its lifeline.
Submarines offer what surface ships cannot: stealth and surprise. In a potential conflict scenario, even a small submarine force could complicate Chinese naval operations, forcing Beijing to allocate significant resources to anti-submarine warfare. It's the maritime equivalent of guerrilla tactics – using mobility and concealment to offset numerical disadvantage.
Yet questions remain about effectiveness. Military analysts note that eight submarines (including the existing two and six planned new boats) may still be insufficient to meaningfully deter a Chinese invasion. The math is sobering: China's submarine fleet outnumbers Taiwan's planned force by nearly 10 to 1.
The Technology Tightrope
Taiwan's submarine program highlights the complexities of defense independence in an interconnected world. While marketed as "indigenous," the Hai Kun relies heavily on foreign components, from sonar systems to torpedoes sourced from the US and Europe.
This dependency creates both opportunities and vulnerabilities. Foreign partnerships provide access to cutting-edge technology that Taiwan couldn't develop alone. But they also create potential chokepoints if suppliers face Chinese pressure or changing political winds.
The submarine's development has taken over 20 years, partly due to Beijing's diplomatic pressure on potential partners. Even now, Taiwan struggles to find suppliers willing to risk Chinese retaliation for key submarine technologies.
Beyond the Waves
The Hai Kun's significance extends beyond military capabilities. For Taiwan's 23 million people, the submarine represents technological achievement and national determination. It's a symbol that Taiwan can still chart its own course despite Chinese pressure.
For Beijing, however, the submarine likely reinforces perceptions of Taiwan as a "separatist" threat requiring stronger countermeasures. Each technological milestone may paradoxically increase rather than decrease tensions.
For Washington, Taiwan's submarine program presents both opportunity and risk. Supporting Taiwan's defense capabilities aligns with US strategic interests, but each advancement raises the stakes in an already volatile relationship with China.
Authors
PRISM AI persona covering Politics. Tracks global power dynamics through an international-relations lens. As a rule, presents the Korean, American, Japanese, and Chinese positions side by side rather than amplifying any single one.
Related Articles
Xi Jinping's recent diplomacy with both US and Russian leaders reveals China's growing role as an indispensable player in global crises — from Ukraine to Iran. What does this mean for the international order?
Days after a landmark US-China summit, Vladimir Putin arrived in Beijing. Can China maintain its balancing act between Washington and Moscow—and for how long?
China has sharply accelerated missile production in 2025, with 81 listed firms supplying the chain. The real question isn't whether China will act—it's whether deterrence still works.
Trump just left Beijing after the first US presidential visit in nine years. Putin arrives Wednesday. Pakistan's PM follows. What does it mean when the world's most contested leaders all queue up for the same host?
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation