How Soviet Urban Planning Became Russia's Weapon Against Ukraine

Every day, Rita faces a gamble when she returns to her Kyiv apartment. "Will I be able to shower or have hot tea, or neither?" She goes to bed wearing a hat and multiple layers of clothing, hoping tomorrow will be warmer.

Ukraine is enduring its harshest winter in recent memory. With January temperatures dropping below -15°C, Russia has systematically attacked energy infrastructure, leaving approximately one million Ukrainians without heating.

When Urban Design Becomes Warfare

Following Russia's latest bombardment on January 24th, nearly 6,000 apartment blocks in Kyiv lost heating, according to Mayor Vitaly Klitschko. This marks the third such attack targeting the capital's heating infrastructure in just over two weeks.

The root of Ukraine's vulnerability lies in its Soviet-era urban landscape. Across Ukrainian cities, massive apartment complexes rely on communal central heating systems where water is heated at large plants and pumped through radiators to thousands of homes.

Kyivteploenergo, the monopoly supplying heating to Ukraine's capital, told the BBC that the "absolute majority" of Kyiv houses depend on its services. In Zaporizhzhia, a frontline city of 750,000 people, nearly three-quarters of residents rely on central heating.

Before Russia's 2022 invasion, about 11 million Ukrainian households depended on central heating, compared to seven million with autonomous heating systems, according to energy expert Yuriy Korolchuk.

The Soviet Legacy's Double Edge

The 1950s Soviet construction boom created Ukraine's distinctive urban skyline: ubiquitous nine-story "panelki" made from prefabricated concrete panels and smaller five-story "khrushchevki" apartments named after Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev.

These buildings connect to massive heating plants called TETs - "heat and electricity centrals" that generate both power and warmth. The system prioritized efficiency and economies of scale, perfect for peacetime urban planning.

"Ukraine inherited the Soviet heating system and hasn't changed anything - it stays predominantly centralized," Korolchuk explains. "These heating plants weren't designed to withstand missile or drone attacks. That's why these vulnerabilities emerged during the war."

A New Weapon of War

Korolchuk identifies this as a new Russian tactic. "During previous winters, there were no such strikes against the heating system. They happened only occasionally and didn't directly target heating plants."

The timing isn't coincidental. "The factor of negotiations is possibly playing a role now - it's a form of pressure," he suggests, referring to ongoing talks to end the war.

While centralized systems offer efficiency, they create single points of failure. When bombs or drones strike these installations, hundreds of thousands suffer simultaneously.

The Resilience Challenge

The Ukrainian government recognizes this critical vulnerability and plans to mandate individual heating systems for apartment blocks. However, undoing decades of Soviet urban planning won't happen quickly or easily.

This situation raises broader questions about urban resilience. Cities worldwide have embraced centralized systems for efficiency - from district heating in Scandinavia to integrated utility networks in smart cities. The Ukrainian experience demonstrates how peacetime advantages can become wartime liabilities.