Duterte's Defense Calls Drug War Case 'Layered Hearsay' at ICC

"Show Me the Evidence"

Rodrigo Duterte's defense team came out swinging at the International Criminal Court, dismissing the case against the former Philippine president as built on "layered hearsay" rather than solid evidence. The so-called systematic killing plan during his drug war? Pure speculation, they argued.

In Friday's hearing in Hamburg, Germany, defense lawyers painted a picture of a case propped up by media pressure, victims' emotional appeals, and self-confessing killers promised de facto impunity. It's a bold strategy—attacking not just the evidence, but the very foundation of how international justice operates in high-profile cases.

The Human Element

While lawyers debated legal technicalities, the human cost was impossible to ignore. A mother from Quezon City, whose son was killed during the drug war, watched the proceedings via video link. Her presence served as a stark reminder that behind the legal arguments lie thousands of lives lost.

Interestingly, Duterte's lawyers didn't oppose his continued detention—a move that could signal cooperation with the court process, even while fighting the charges.

Sovereignty vs. Justice

This case tests the limits of international law. The Philippines withdrew from the ICC in 2019, yet here's their former president facing charges. The court's jurisdiction stems from crimes allegedly committed while the Philippines was still a member—a legal precedent with implications far beyond this single case.

For Southeast Asia's authoritarian leaders, this trial represents either a dangerous precedent or a necessary check on power. Myanmar's junta, Cambodia's strongmen—they're all watching to see if international justice can truly reach beyond borders.