North Korea Warns of 'Countermeasures' as U.S. Nuclear Submarine Docks in South Korea
North Korea has strongly condemned the arrival of the U.S. nuclear submarine USS Greeneville in Busan, calling it a 'grave security threat' and warning of 'countermeasures,' raising tensions.
A U.S. nuclear-powered submarine's port call in South Korea for supplies and rest has ignited a furious response from Pyongyang. North Korea's defense ministry denounced the visit as a "grave security threat," warning of unspecified "countermeasures" and escalating tensions on the already volatile Korean Peninsula.
The USS Greeneville's Arrival and Pyongyang's Rebuke
The USS Greeneville, a Los Angeles-class nuclear-powered attack submarine, arrived at a naval base in Busan, South Korea, on Tuesday, December 23. According to Seoul's Navy, the visit's purpose was to replenish supplies and provide rest for the crew. However, North Korea framed the move as a major provocation.
In a statement dated December 24 and reported by Yonhap News Agency, the DPRK's defense ministry claimed, "The repeated emergence of the U.S. strategic asset ... constitutes a grave act of causing instability and escalating military tensions." The ministry further warned that the U.S. nuclear threat is pushing Pyongyang toward securing a "strategic retaliatory capability for wiping out such threatening entities."
Context of Deterrence and Alliance
Pyongyang's statement appears to be a direct response to strengthening U.S.-South Korea security ties. It specifically referenced Washington's recent reaffirmation of "extended deterrence" for Seoul and its support for South Korea's plan to acquire its own nuclear-powered submarines. North Korea accused the U.S. of attempting to "cement the structure of a nuclear-to-nuclear collision," vowing to continue its own defense capability development.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
The top U.S. general in South Korea says both allies aim to meet OPCON transfer conditions by early 2029—bringing Seoul closer to commanding its own forces in wartime for the first time since 1950.
USFK Commander Gen. Brunson confirmed THAAD remains in Korea but admitted munitions are heading to the Middle East. What does this mean for Korean Peninsula deterrence, OPCON transfer, and the future of the US-South Korea alliance?
Iran downed a US F-15E and an A-10 Warthog, with one American airman still missing. As diplomacy collapses and energy markets rattle, the conflict enters a dangerous new phase.
Defense Secretary Hegseth declared a turning point in the U.S.-Israel war against Iran, refusing to rule out ground operations. What happens next — and who pays the price?
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation