Trump's Peace Board Snubs Key Allies for Strategic Middle Powers
Indonesia, Vietnam, and Cambodia get seats at Trump's Peace Board while Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia are notably absent. A calculated geopolitical pivot.
Out of 650 million people across Southeast Asia, only three leaders made the cut. When President Trump convenes his first formal Board of Peace meeting in Washington on Thursday, just three Southeast Asian nations will have seats at the table: Indonesia, Vietnam, and Cambodia.
What's striking isn't who's there—it's who's missing. The Philippines and Thailand, both longtime U.S. allies, didn't get invitations. Neither did Malaysia, despite its existing trade partnership with America.
The Alliance Paradox
The three chosen leaders—Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, Vietnam's top leader To Lam, and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet—share a crucial trait: they're all from non-aligned middle powers walking tightropes between Washington and Beijing.
Indonesia, with 270 million citizens, is Southeast Asia's largest economy yet maintains careful neutrality between the superpowers. Vietnam borders China but charts its own course in South China Sea disputes. Even Cambodia, traditionally Beijing's closest regional ally, has been warming to Washington lately.
Meanwhile, the Philippines under Marcos Jr. has clearly tilted toward America, Thailand maintains a 70-year alliance with the U.S., and Malaysia already has trade deals locked in.
Trump's Calculation
"Why court countries that are already in your corner?" seems to be Trump's thinking. He's betting on persuadable fence-sitters rather than reliable allies who'll stick around regardless.
Indonesia offers particular appeal—the world's largest Muslim nation and a G20 member with serious symbolic weight. Vietnam, with 100 million people, represents a manufacturing powerhouse crucial for any "China+1" supply chain strategy.
Cambodia's invitation is perhaps the boldest move. Bringing a former Chinese Belt and Road showcase into America's orbit would represent a significant geopolitical coup. Recent U.S.-Cambodia military cooperation suggests this isn't just wishful thinking.
The Middle Power Moment
This selection reflects a broader shift in Trump's foreign policy approach. Rather than reinforcing existing alliances, he's prioritizing countries that could swing either way—nations with agency in the great power competition.
For these middle powers, the invitation represents validation of their strategic importance. They're not just regional players anymore; they're global swing states whose choices could reshape the balance of power.
The timing matters too. As U.S.-China competition intensifies, these countries increasingly find themselves holding cards that both superpowers want. Trump is making his bid early.
What This Means for Traditional Allies
Longstanding U.S. partners might feel a chill. If you're already locked into the American orbit, you might not get the same attention as countries still making up their minds.
This creates a peculiar dynamic: being a reliable ally could actually reduce your leverage. Countries that maintain strategic ambiguity might find themselves courted more aggressively than those that have already chosen sides.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
Southeast Asian super-app Grab plans to triple profits by 2028 following its first profitable year in 2025, with aggressive investments in autonomous driving and regional expansion
Hours after Supreme Court struck down his tariff regime, Trump announced a 10% global tariff using different legal authority. Markets shrugged, but $140 billion in refunds remain in limbo.
The US Supreme Court struck down Trump's tariff policies, reshaping global trade dynamics. What this means for consumers, businesses, and international markets.
Trump announces 10% global tariff using 1974 Trade Act after Supreme Court struck down his emergency powers tariffs. Trade war enters new phase with legal uncertainty.
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation