Crypto Money Laundering Hits $82B as Chinese Networks Build Underground Empire
Cryptocurrency money laundering has exploded from $10B to $82B in five years, with Chinese-language networks now controlling 20% of global illicit flows through Telegram-based services.
$82 billion. That's how much dirty money flowed through cryptocurrency laundering channels in 2025 alone—an eightfold increase from $10 billion in 2020, according to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis.
But here's what should really grab your attention: Chinese-language money laundering networks (CMLNs) now control roughly 20% of all known illicit crypto flows, essentially becoming the backbone of the global digital underground economy.
This isn't your grandfather's money laundering. We're talking about a professionalized, industrial-scale operation that advertises openly on Telegram channels and operates with the efficiency of a legitimate financial service.
The Telegram Marketplace Revolution
Forget shadowy back-alley deals. Today's crypto launderers run their operations like Amazon for dirty money. They advertise "Black U" services—trading tainted cryptocurrency at discounted rates—right on public messaging platforms.
Chainalysis identified $16.1 billion processed through Chinese networks in 2025 alone, spread across 1,800 active wallets and six distinct service categories. At the center of this ecosystem sit "guarantee platforms"—Telegram-based escrow services that connect buyers and sellers of laundering services with the reliability of eBay's feedback system.
When individual channels get shut down, vendors simply migrate to new ones. It's like a digital hydra: cut off one head, and two more appear.
Why Chinese Networks Dominate
The numbers tell a stark story. Since 2020, inflows to Chinese-language networks have grown thousands of times faster than those to centralized exchanges or DeFi protocols. This isn't coincidence—it's strategic adaptation.
As criminals increasingly avoid venues where funds can be frozen, these networks have filled the gap with sophisticated infrastructure. They offer everything from "running point" brokers who provide initial access to bank accounts, to sprawling money mule networks and informal OTC desks.
The irony is palpable: China's strict cryptocurrency regulations may have inadvertently pushed innovation underground, creating more sophisticated laundering operations than might have existed in a more permissive regulatory environment.
The Ripple Effects
This professionalization of crypto laundering creates headaches far beyond law enforcement. For legitimate cryptocurrency businesses, it means increased compliance costs, more invasive KYC requirements, and constant scrutiny from regulators who struggle to distinguish between innovation and criminality.
For investors, it adds another layer of uncertainty. Every regulatory crackdown on laundering networks sends ripples through crypto markets, affecting prices and sentiment. The recent sanctions and advisories mentioned in the report are just the beginning—expect more aggressive enforcement actions as governments grapple with this $82 billion problem.
The speed and scale also suggest these networks have deep connections to offline criminal organizations, including scam operations and cybercrime rings. This isn't just about moving money—it's about enabling an entire ecosystem of digital crime.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation
Related Articles
Bitcoin and ether volumes drop 20%+ as gold hits records and silver surges 57% YTD. Low liquidity keeps crypto range-bound while metals attract haven flows.
Chinese state miner Zijin Mining acquires Canada's Allied Gold for $4 billion, securing gold mines across Mali, Ivory Coast, and Ethiopia as gold hits $5,000 amid geopolitical tensions.
As Bitcoin extends its decline ahead of Fed decision and Big Tech earnings, gold and silver surge to record highs, revealing crypto's identity crisis as a risk asset rather than safe haven.
Silver trading volume nears $1 billion on Hyperliquid, surpassing SOL and XRP. What does this shift toward traditional assets on crypto infrastructure mean for the market?
Thoughts