Paris Is the Rehearsal. Beijing Is the Show.

The meeting is in Paris. The real negotiation is somewhere else entirely.

This weekend, He Lifeng, China's Vice-Premier, and Scott Bessent, the US Treasury Secretary, will sit down in the French capital to discuss tariffs, soybeans, and rare earths. Analysts are already tempering expectations. Don't look for a breakthrough, they say. Look instead at what comes after: a summit between Xi Jinping and Donald Trump in Beijing, expected before the month is out. Paris is the warm-up act.

The Architecture of a Managed Meeting

The choice of Paris as a venue is deliberate. Neither side wants to be seen as the one making the trip — the optics of visiting the other's capital carry diplomatic weight. A neutral city allows both delegations to frame the meeting as equals coming together, rather than one side seeking an audience with the other.

The timing is equally calculated. Since Trump's return to the White House, US-China tensions have ratcheted back up. Additional tariffs on Chinese goods, Chinese export restrictions on critical minerals, and a deepening technology war have left both economies absorbing real costs. The question isn't whether both sides want relief — they do. The question is what each side is willing to give.

What's Actually on the Table

Three issues are expected to dominate the Paris talks.

Tariffs are the most visible lever. A partial rollback of US tariffs on Chinese imports, paired with Chinese commitments to purchase more American goods, would echo the structure of the Phase One trade deal signed in 2020. That deal ultimately fell short of its targets, but it gave both governments something to announce. A similar formula may be in play here.

Rare earths carry more strategic weight. China controls over 60% of global rare earth production — materials essential to EV batteries, semiconductors, and defense systems. Beijing has already signaled willingness to use export restrictions as leverage. The fact that rare earths are on the agenda at all suggests China is offering to ease those restrictions in exchange for something meaningful from Washington.

Soybeans are the most politically loaded item. American soybean exports to China represent a lifeline for farming states that form a core part of Trump's electoral base. A credible Chinese commitment to increase soybean purchases would let the administration claim a tangible win for rural America — the kind of deliverable that plays well in a press conference.

Sponsored

Advertise with Us

[email protected]

Sponsored

Why Analysts Are Skeptical

Here's the problem: none of these issues get at what's actually driving US-China friction.

The structural conflict between Washington and Beijing isn't about soybeans or tariff percentages. It's about semiconductor export controls, Taiwan, and who sets the rules for the next generation of critical technology. Those are not issues that get resolved in a weekend meeting between a vice-premier and a treasury secretary. They're barely issues that get resolved between heads of state.

What Paris can produce is a set of agreed-upon talking points — a choreography for Beijing. Both Xi and Trump need the summit to look successful. That means both need something to announce. The job of the Paris talks is to figure out what that something will be, and whether it's enough to call a win.

How Different Stakeholders Read This

For the Trump administration, the framing is straightforward: America negotiates from strength, extracts concessions, and delivers results for farmers and manufacturers. Whether the substance matches the framing is a separate question.

For Xi, the Beijing summit serves a different domestic purpose. It signals that China remains a peer of the United States — that the world's two largest economies manage their relationship directly, bilaterally, and on roughly equal terms. In a year when China's economy faces continued headwinds, that optic matters.

For Europe, the mood is closer to unease. A bilateral US-China deal on tariffs and trade could reshape global trade flows in ways that leave European exporters navigating a new architecture they had no hand in designing. Brussels has watched this dynamic before, and it doesn't love the view.

For markets, the signal is cautious optimism. A summit that produces even modest deliverables could reduce near-term uncertainty in sectors like semiconductors, agriculture, and energy. But investors who've tracked US-China relations through multiple cycles know that announcements and implementation are two very different things.

The Limits of Managed Rivalry

There's a broader pattern worth naming. The US and China have developed a rhythm of escalation followed by managed de-escalation — tensions rise, markets react, officials meet, a deal is announced, and the underlying competition continues unchanged. Each cycle produces headlines. Fewer produce durable change.

The rare earths issue illustrates the dynamic well. If a deal is struck in Paris, US pressure to develop alternative supply chains — in Australia, Canada, and elsewhere — may ease. That reduces the urgency of the diversification that many strategists argue is necessary regardless of what China agrees to today. Short-term relief can crowd out long-term resilience.