The GM Standoff: Why Trump's Push for Soy and Corn Has India on Edge
The U.S. is pressuring India to open its markets to GM soy and corn, sparking a conflict between global trade ambitions and the livelihoods of millions of farmers. An in-depth look at the high-stakes agricultural standoff.
As the United States pressures India to open its market to genetically modified (GM) soy and corn, a high-stakes trade negotiation is putting millions of farmers on edge and forcing New Delhi into a difficult political corner. According to Al Jazeera, the standoff pits President Donald Trump's trade agenda against India's identity as a global supplier of non-GM crops.
Washington's Gambit, New Delhi's Guard
At the heart of the dispute is Washington's demand for access to India's vast agriculture sector. The U.S. is seeking new markets for its soy and corn after a trade war with China, once its top buyer, caused sales to plummet. "Trump has to sell this soya and corn so as not to annoy his big political base of the soya [and] corn farmers," said Suman Sahai, founder of the nonprofit Gene Campaign. To increase pressure, the U.S. has already imposed 50 percent tariffs on various Indian exports.
India's resistance is rooted in its agricultural brand. The country produces about 13.05 million tonnes of soy and 42 million tonnes of corn, and has carved out a niche in the international market by promoting its crops as non-GM and 'organic'. Policymakers and exporters worry that allowing GM imports would create a perception of contamination, potentially destroying the premium they command. "The import of GM material would create a doubt of adulteration in the minds of foreign buyers," warned corn exporter Hemant Jain.
The View From the Fields
For Indian farmers, the threat feels existential. Many, like Mahesh Patel in Madhya Pradesh, are already struggling with erratic weather and poor harvests. He told Al Jazeera that excessive rain destroyed his crops, yielding just 9,000kg—one-fifth of his usual output. Farmers complain of being squeezed by low prices from traders and the high cost of seeds and fertilizers.
They fear they cannot possibly compete with heavily subsidized U.S. agribusiness. One farmer noted that while an Indian farm might produce one metric tonne of soy per acre, GM varieties can yield up to three. "Indian farmers can’t win against the U.S. government’s subsidized agri-commodities," said analyst Indra Shekhar Singh. "They would capture the complete market in a few years, leaving our farmers in deep poverty."
A Nation Divided and a Government on a Tightrope
The debate, however, is not one-sided. Some scientists and industry figures in India argue that GM technology could be a boon. An anonymous government scientist said insect-resistant GM crops would reduce the need for expensive pesticides, while poultry feed supplier Kawaljeet Bhatia noted that increased yields would benefit the entire supply chain. Bhatia suggested, however, that India should develop its own GM seeds rather than importing them.
The Indian government is proceeding with extreme caution. Agriculture contributes 18 percent to the country's GDP and supports 46 percent of its population. The memory of the massive farmers' protests that rocked the nation in 2020-21 is still fresh, making any decision on agriculture politically explosive. "The government is definitely concerned about its vote bank before taking any decision," political commentator Sibaji Pratim Basu told Al Jazeera.
This is more than a trade dispute; it's a clash between two fundamentally different agricultural models. The U.S. system of high-tech, large-scale, subsidized farming is running headlong into India's small-holder, labor-intensive system, which functions as much as a social safety net as an economic sector. The outcome could redefine India's food security and rural economy for decades.
본 콘텐츠는 AI가 원문 기사를 기반으로 요약 및 분석한 것입니다. 정확성을 위해 노력하지만 오류가 있을 수 있으며, 원문 확인을 권장합니다.
관련 기사
일본 정부가 2026년도 예산안을 사상 최대 규모로 편성할 전망이다. 물가 상승과 도쿄 부동산 가격 급등 속에서 나온 이번 결정은 일본 경제가 직면한 딜레마를 보여준다.
미군이 동태평양에서 마약 밀수 의심 선박을 공격해 1명이 사망했습니다. 이번 사건의 배경과 해상 마약 단속 작전의 강화 기조, 그리고 국제법적 쟁점을 분석합니다.
일본 정부가 2027년 도입할 새 외국인 노동자 제도 '육성취로'의 초안을 공개했습니다. 기존 기능실습생 제도를 대체하며, 초기 2년간 약 42만 6천 명의 상한선을 설정하는 방안을 검토 중입니다.
중국 항저우에서 열릴 예정이던 대규모 코믹 컨벤션 '코믹업'이 개막을 불과 일주일 앞두고 일본 관련 콘텐츠를 전면 금지했다. 악화하는 중일 관계가 문화계에 미치는 영향을 심층 분석한다.