Trump Photo Among 16 Documents Mysteriously Pulled From DOJ's Epstein File Release
The U.S. Department of Justice quietly removed at least 16 documents, including a photo of Donald Trump, from its public Epstein file release. The unexplained action raises serious questions about government transparency and information management.
Key Takeaways
Less than a day after the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) posted its initial tranche of files related to financier Jeffrey Epstein, at least 16 documents—including one containing a photograph of Donald Trump—vanished from the public website without notice or explanation, raising immediate questions about government transparency.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Department of Justice has removed at least 16 documents from its public release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files, a move made less than 24 hours after they were first published on December 20. The quiet removal is drawing scrutiny and fueling concerns over the handling of highly sensitive information in a case of immense public interest.
Among the pulled documents was one that reportedly contained a photograph showing former President Donald Trump. According to multiple media outlets, the photo itself depicted a desk covered with various framed pictures.
Background: The Epstein Document Release
The files are part of extensive legal proceedings involving the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, whose network allegedly included powerful figures from politics, business, and academia. The release has been highly anticipated by the public, and the transparency of the process is seen as critical to maintaining trust in the judicial system's handling of the far-reaching scandal.
An Unexplained Reversal
As of this report, the DOJ has offered no official reason for the removal, nor has it indicated if or when the documents might be reposted. This lack of communication has created an information vacuum, prompting speculation about the motives behind the decision. Government accountability advocates argue that such actions, regardless of intent, can undermine public trust and compromise the principle of open access to judicial records.
The incident highlights the procedural challenges and political sensitivities surrounding high-profile information releases. By temporarily making sensitive documents public only to retract them, the DOJ has inadvertently intensified the focus on its own processes and the selective nature of government disclosure.
PRISM Insight
The DOJ's uncommunicated reversal highlights a critical tension in modern governance: the demand for radical transparency versus the state's traditional control over sensitive information. In an era of rampant misinformation, such procedural opaqueness, regardless of intent, can be as damaging as the information itself, eroding public trust at a time when it is most scarce.
関連記事
韓国電力公社（KEPCO）が、206兆ウォン超の負債を理由に2026年第1四半期の電気料金を据え置くと発表。エネルギー価格が下落する中での異例の決定の背景と、同社の深刻な財務状況について解説します。
わずか18ヶ月で2度の大量殺人事件がオーストラリアの象徴ボンダイを襲った。安全神話が崩壊し、コミュニティが深いトラウマを負う中、反ユダヤ主義、政治不信、社会の亀裂が浮き彫りになる。悲劇がオーストラリアに突きつけた問いとは。
2025年末、世界は複数の地政学的危機に直面。米国の外交政策、南米の右傾化、EUメルコスール協定の遅延、そしてアフガニスタンの人道問題まで、現代の複雑な国際情勢を多角的に分析します。
ナイジェリア政府は11月に拉致された生徒130人の解放を発表し「全員無事」と宣言。しかし当初の行方不明者数との食い違いから情報が錯綜しており、背景にある深刻な治安問題と「誘拐ビジネス」の実態を解説します。