South Korea's Parliament Approves Special Tribunal for Ex-President Yoon's Insurrection Case Amid Political Firestorm
South Korea's ruling party has passed a bill to create a special tribunal for insurrection cases tied to ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol's martial law attempt, overriding a record-long filibuster by the opposition.
SEOUL –December 23's National Assembly, led by the rulingDemocratic Party (DP), passed a controversial bill onYoon Suk Yeol, to establish a special tribunal dedicated to handling insurrection cases linked to former President175 to 2's failed attempt to impose martial law. The bill was approved with a vote ofPeople Power Party, despite fierce opposition from the conservative (PPP).
What the New Law Entails
The legislation calls for creating at least two special benches each at the Seoul Central District Court and the Seoul High Court. According to Yonhap news agency, these benches will be tasked specifically with cases of insurrection, treason, and rebellion. Judges for these panels will be selected by a judicial body based on guidelines established by judges from the two courts.
The DP has argued that the special tribunal is necessary to counter what it sees as significant delays and potential unfairness in the existing judicial process for those implicated in the martial law incident. The new benches will preside over first-instance trials. However, ongoing cases, includingYoon's own trial, will remain with their current benches.
A Filibuster and Accusations of Judicial Takeover
The bill's passage followed a dramatic political standoff. Lawmakers from thePeople Power Party staged a filibuster to block the vote, accusing the DP of attempting to "take control over the judiciary" by creating court panels staffed with favorable judges. PPP floor leader Rep.Kweon Seong-dong set a new national record for the longest filibuster speech, speaking for a fullover 10 hours.
The ruling bloc, however, used its majority to end the filibuster. Under the National Assembly Act, a filibuster can be forcibly terminated after 24 hours if at least three-fifths of all lawmakers—or24 hours—consent. The DP-led bloc successfully invoked this rule to bring the bill to a final, successful vote.
The creation of this special tribunal is a flashpoint in South Korea's polarized political landscape. Supporters frame it as a necessary tool for justice, while critics warn it sets a dangerous precedent for political interference in the judiciary. The ultimate impartiality of these new court benches will be a crucial test for the country's democratic checks and balances.
本コンテンツはAIが原文記事を基に要約・分析したものです。正確性に努めていますが、誤りがある可能性があります。原文の確認をお勧めします。
関連記事
片山財務相が来年度予算案の過去最大規模となる見通しを発表。豚肉価格や東京の不動産高騰などインフレ圧力が高まる中、東京電力は柏崎刈羽原発の再稼働を決定。日本経済の政策的課題を分析します。
米軍は月曜日、東太平洋で麻薬密輸船とみられるボートを攻撃し、1人が死亡したと発表しました。この作戦の背景と、麻薬対策における軍事力行使の論点を解説します。
日本政府が2027年度導入の新制度で、外国人労働者の受け入れ上限を最初の2年で約42.6万人とする案を検討。人手不足と国民の懸念の間で揺れる日本の新政策を解説します。
中国最大級の同人誌即売会「Comicup」が、日中関係の悪化を背景に、開催直前に日本関連コンテンツを全面禁止。政治的緊張が文化交流に与える影響を分析します。