Liabooks Home|PRISM News
Oscar Insiders Say There's a '1,000% Chance' Voters Will Lie About Watching Nominated Films
ViralAI分析

Oscar Insiders Say There's a '1,000% Chance' Voters Will Lie About Watching Nominated Films

Source

The Academy now requires Oscar voters to watch all nominated films, but anonymous insiders tell EW there's a '1,000% chance' they'll lie. Will the new rule change anything, or just create new problems?

The Academy just rolled out a new rule requiring voters to watch every film in a category before casting a ballot, but insiders are already predicting it will fail spectacularly. One awards strategist told Entertainment Weekly there’s a “” chance members will simply lie, raising questions about the integrity of Hollywood's most prestigious award.

The Academy's New Honor System

It’s long been an open secret that not all voters do their homework. In an interview ahead of the ceremony, an Oscar-nominated actress admitted she hadn't seen most of the contenders. More recently, surveyed four voters and found three hadn't watched Best Picture nominee *The Substance*.

To combat this, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences () has implemented a “procedural change” for the current awards season. Now, a category will only unlock on a member's digital ballot after they've proven they've seen all the nominated films. This is tracked automatically via the official Academy Screening Room or through a self-reporting form for outside viewings, which requires verifiable details like time and location. “I really believe that our members take this responsibility very seriously,” an Academy officer stated, adding, “I don’t believe that people will fib.”

An Unintended Power Shift?

Industry insiders aren't so sure. “The TV Academy and [have this policy] already, and there’s no way to police it,” an anonymous awards strategist said, suggesting people often vote for friends or to support a social message rather than a film's quality.

However, a studio campaign representative offered a different take, theorizing the new system could have an unexpected side effect: giving more voting power to the specialized branches. “If you’re a busy actor or director, you’re probably just not going to vote in that category,” the rep estimated, referring to below-the-line awards like sound or score. This means the relatively small number of members within those specific branches (e.g., sound editors, composers) will have more sway over the final winner. The change could curb the kind of 'down-ballot' voting that leads to sweeps, like big night, where voters may have just checked the box for the same film across multiple technical categories.

PRISM Insight: The Specialist's Oscar

This new rule may be less about enforcing honesty and more about unintentionally rebalancing power within the Academy. By discouraging casual, uninformed voting in technical categories, the system could effectively shift influence from the general membership to dedicated specialists. This could lead to more diverse, expert-driven winners and mark the beginning of the end for the predictable awards-season 'sweep'.

本コンテンツはAIが原文記事を基に要約・分析したものです。正確性に努めていますが、誤りがある可能性があります。原文の確認をお勧めします。

HollywoodOscarsFilm IndustryEntertainmentAcademy Awards

関連記事

「『ホリデイ』はクリスマス映画じゃない」ナンシー・マイヤーズ監督、未公開写真と共に明かす制作秘話
ViralJP
「『ホリデイ』はクリスマス映画じゃない」ナンシー・マイヤーズ監督、未公開写真と共に明かす制作秘話

『ホリデイ』のナンシー・マイヤーズ監督が、インスタグラムで未公開の舞台裏写真を公開。同時に、多くのファンが抱くイメージとは裏腹に、本作を「クリスマス映画」とは考えていない理由を明かしました。

63年間燃え続ける「沈黙の火災」:ごみ焼却が招いたペンシルベニア州ゴーストタウンの悲劇
ViralJP
63年間燃え続ける「沈黙の火災」:ごみ焼却が招いたペンシルベニア州ゴーストタウンの悲劇

1962年、ペンシルベニア州セントラリアで始まったごみ処理の火が、63年経った今も地下の炭鉱で燃え続けています。この終わらない火災が、いかにして一つの町をゴーストタウンに変えたのかを解説します。

「え、マジ?」突然のメッセージに動揺しないための心理学的対処法
ViralJP
「え、マジ?」突然のメッセージに動揺しないための心理学的対処法

パートナーからの突然の別れ話や、予期せぬメッセージにどう対応しますか?心理学者が教える、心を落ち着かせ、冷静に対処するための4つの科学的ステップを紹介します。

離陸直前の機内で死亡した高齢女性、「搭乗時にはすでに…」乗客の証言で疑惑が浮上
ViralJP
離陸直前の機内で死亡した高齢女性、「搭乗時にはすでに…」乗客の証言で疑惑が浮上

Easyjet機内で高齢女性が死亡。しかし他の乗客は「搭乗時にはすでに亡くなっていた」と証言。航空会社はこれを否定しており、疑惑が深まっています。一体何が起きたのでしょうか。