Liabooks Home|PRISM News
China Unplugs a Decade of EV Subsidies, Pivoting to the Next Tech Frontier
PoliticsAI分析

China Unplugs a Decade of EV Subsidies, Pivoting to the Next Tech Frontier

Source

China has dropped electric vehicles (EVs) from its list of strategic industries for the first time in a decade, signaling a major policy shift. What does this mean for the global market, and what lessons can the U.S. learn from China's industrial playbook?

After a decade of relentless state-led investment that made it the world's undisputed electric vehicle (EV) leader, China has made a stunning policy pivot. In its 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030), Beijing omitted EVs from its official list of strategic industries for the first time in ten years. The move signals that China's leadership believes the industry has graduated from its hyper-accelerated development phase and is ready to face market forces, a transition that holds critical lessons for the U.S. and its allies.

Venture-Capital Statecraft and Its Side Effects

China's EV dominance was built on a strategy best described as venture-capital statecraft. From 2009 to 2023, the government poured an astonishing $230 billion into the sector through subsidies, tax breaks, and cheap credit. This happened even when demand was negligible; in 2009, total EV sales in China were just 500 units. The bet paid off. By 2024, China's EV production hit 12.4 million units, accounting for 70% of global output.

However, this supply-side push created severe economic distortions. The strategy led to what Beijing now calls “involution”—a state of hyper-competition, overcapacity, and deflation. China's EV production capacity is now three times its domestic demand. As of August 2025, only three EV makers—BYD, Li Auto, and Aito—are profitable. This imbalance is economy-wide: nearly a quarter of all industrial firms are losing money, the highest share since 2001, as investment consistently outpaces consumption.

The Export Release Valve and the New Blueprint

So far, China has managed these pressures through a crucial 'release valve': exports. With domestic demand weak, overseas markets have absorbed the massive overcapacity. China's record $992 billion trade surplus in 2024 was a key driver of its 5% GDP growth. In markets like Brazil, Mexico, and Thailand, Chinese models account for over 80% of EV imports. Some local officials even resorted to inflating economic data by exporting “zero-mileage” cars as 'used' to foreign markets at a discount.

With the EV industry now considered mature, Beijing is applying the same playbook to a new set of frontiers. The new strategic industries list is a guide to the future: quantum technology, bio-manufacturing, hydrogen and fusion energy, 6G communications, embodied intelligence, and brain-computer interfaces. These sectors are now slated to receive the same preferential financing and state support that built China's EV empire.

PRISM Insight: The Competitor's Playbook

China's experience offers a clear, if costly, blueprint for scaling new industries. For U.S. policymakers, the lesson is twofold. First, industrial policy must balance supply-side incentives with demand-creation measures like public procurement and tax credits to avoid creating domestic overcapacity. Second, strategic coordination with allies on R&D, market access, and targeted protectionism is crucial to effectively compete with China's state-driven model.

本コンテンツはAIが原文記事を基に要約・分析したものです。正確性に努めていますが、誤りがある可能性があります。原文の確認をお勧めします。

ChinaUS-ChinaElectric VehiclesIndustrial PolicyTechnology

関連記事

メキシコ海軍機が米国テキサス州沖で墜落、少なくとも5人死亡 医療搬送中の悲劇
PoliticsJP
メキシコ海軍機が米国テキサス州沖で墜落、少なくとも5人死亡 医療搬送中の悲劇

メキシコ海軍の小型機が米国テキサス州沖で墜落し、搭乗していた8人のうち少なくとも5人が死亡した。同機は重度の火傷を負った子供を搬送する医療ミッションの最中だった。米国当局が事故原因の調査を開始している。

韓国国会、「内乱特別法廷」設置法案を可決 尹前大統領の戒厳令問題で
PoliticsJP
韓国国会、「内乱特別法廷」設置法案を可決 尹前大統領の戒厳令問題で

韓国国会は23日、与党「共に民主党」主導で、尹錫悦前大統領の戒厳令問題に関連する内乱事件を専門に扱う特別法廷の設置法案を可決した。野党は「司法の掌握」と強く反発している。

シリア・アレッポで政府軍とクルド勢力が停戦合意、市民2人死亡の衝突受け
PoliticsJP
シリア・アレッポで政府軍とクルド勢力が停戦合意、市民2人死亡の衝突受け

シリア北部アレッポで、政府軍とクルド人勢力SDFが停戦に合意。トルコ外相の訪問中に発生した衝突では市民2人が死亡しており、地域の緊張関係を浮き彫りにしています。

「1644年史観」とは?中国で清朝を批判するネット論争が、国家の歴史観とナショナリズムに与える影響
PoliticsJP
「1644年史観」とは?中国で清朝を批判するネット論争が、国家の歴史観とナショナリズムに与える影響

中国のネットで「1644年史観」が拡散。清朝に歴史的苦難の責任を問うこの論争は、当局の批判を呼び、ナショナリズムや歴史観、社会統制を巡るデリケートな問題を浮き彫りにしています。