The 200-Year-Old Ghost: Trump Venezuela Monroe Doctrine and the Stakes of Intervention

One doctrine, two centuries, and a nation in turmoil. President Trump's latest push against Venezuela isn't just a policy—it's history repeating itself. Rooted in the 1823Monroe Doctrine, this pressure campaign marks the newest chapter in a long saga of U.S. intervention in Latin America. It's a high-stakes gamble that's yielding a volatile mix of success and failure.

Trump Venezuela Monroe Doctrine: A Legacy Reborn

The Monroe Doctrine, originally designed to deter European colonialism, has been repurposed by the Trump administration as a justification for regime pressure. According to Reuters, the U.S. has ramped up economic sanctions to maximum pressure levels. While these moves have successfully isolated Caracas financially, they've also sparked intense debate over the limits of superpower influence in the 21st century.

Assessing the Impact: Diplomatic Stalemate

The campaign's effectiveness remains a point of contention. Proponents argue that the pressure is essential for restoring democracy, but critics point out that the Maduro regime remains entrenched. The resulting economic strain has hit ordinary citizens hard, fueling a humanitarian crisis that ripples across the region. It's a complex tug-of-war between sovereignty and external intervention.