Liabooks Home|PRISM News
Trump's Peace Board Meets Amid European Boycott Over Putin Invite
PoliticsAI Analysis

Trump's Peace Board Meets Amid European Boycott Over Putin Invite

4 min readSource

Trump's Ukraine peace initiative faces European backlash as major allies refuse to participate after Russia's Putin was invited. Can peace talks succeed without key stakeholders?

448 attacks in a single day. That's how many times Russian forces struck Ukraine's Zaporizhia region on February 19, injuring a six-year-old child and destroying homes. While Ukraine endured another day of relentless bombardment, Donald Trump's Board of Peace held its inaugural meeting in Washington. But America's closest allies were notably absent from the table.

A Peace Initiative Without Peacemakers

Trump's peace board convened for the first time on February 19, but the guest list sparked more controversy than hope. The most eyebrow-raising decision? Extending an invitation to Vladimir Putin, the very architect of Ukraine's invasion and a man wanted by the International Criminal Court.

Even Belarus, Russia's closest ally, couldn't make it. Despite completing "all required procedures," Belarusian officials said they were denied US visas. Their Foreign Ministry's response was pointed: "What kind of peace are we talking about if the organizers cannot even complete basic formalities for us to take part?"

France was equally blunt. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Pascal Confavreux expressed "surprise" that the European Commission had sent a representative without proper authorization from the European Council. France made clear it won't participate until the peace board refocuses on Gaza in line with UN Security Council resolutions.

Multiple EU member states have boycotted the initiative entirely, refusing to sit at the same table as Putin.

Europe's Impossible Choice

The European boycott reflects a fundamental dilemma: How do you make peace with someone actively waging war? While Trump positions himself as a dealmaker who can end conflicts through negotiation, European allies see moral hazard in legitimizing Putin's aggression.

The battlefield reality supports their concerns. Russian forces launched those 448 attacks on 34 settlements in Zaporizhia alone. In Kherson region, 5 people were wounded by Russian drone, missile, and artillery strikes. Ukraine responded with its own drone attacks on Sevastopol in occupied Crimea and an oil depot in Russia's Pskov region.

Russia's hybrid warfare continues beyond the battlefield. Dutch intelligence services warned that European countries face increasing threats including cyberattacks, sabotage, influence campaigns, and disinformation. Russia's FSB even escalated rhetoric against Telegram founder Pavel Durov, accusing him of condoning criminal activity on the platform used by millions of Russians and Ukrainians.

The Price of Pragmatism vs. Principles

Sweden announced a $1.42 billion military aid package for Ukraine, including air defenses, drones, long-range missiles, and ammunition. This represents the Western consensus: Ukraine must negotiate from a position of strength, not desperation.

Meanwhile, critical infrastructure remains under threat. The Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant operates on its sole remaining power line after losing backup power over a week ago, according to Rafael Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Hungary is considering halting power and gas exports to Ukraine unless oil flows resume through the Druzhba pipeline, damaged in January attacks.

France pledged €71 million in additional funding for Ukrainian services including energy, health, and landmine clearance—practical support while diplomatic solutions remain elusive.

The Legitimacy Question

Trump's approach raises fundamental questions about conflict resolution. Can you achieve lasting peace by treating aggressor and victim as equal parties? European allies argue that legitimizing Putin's position rewards invasion and sets dangerous precedents for future conflicts.

The peace board's composition tells the story: America's traditional allies absent, Russia invited but not attending, and Ukraine left to wonder whether its sovereignty is negotiable. Telegram dismissed Russian government allegations about foreign intelligence accessing soldiers' messages as "deliberate fabrication," highlighting how even communication platforms become battlegrounds in modern warfare.

This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.

Thoughts

Related Articles