Liabooks Home|PRISM News
Government buildings in Beijing under a cold winter sky
PoliticsAI Analysis

China's First 'Tiger' of 2026: State Council Veteran Tian Xuebin Under Probe

2 min readSource

Tian Xuebin, a former vice-minister who served four Chinese premiers, is the first high-level official probed for corruption in 2026. Read about the CCDI's latest move.

The hunt for 'tigers' hasn't slowed down in the new year. Tian Xuebin, a veteran official who served under four different Chinese premiers, has become the first high-level figure to fall in 2026.

On Monday, January 5, 2026, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI) announced that Tian, age 62, is under investigation for "suspected serious violations of discipline and law." Tian most recently served as the vice-minister of water resources before his retirement in December 2023.

Tian Xuebin China Anti-Corruption Probe: A Career at the Core

Tian's career profile is exceptional, having spent 16 years in the General Office of the State Council—the administrative nerve center of the central government. According to SCMP, he served as a secretary to several top leaders, including former premiers Li Peng, Zhu Rongji, Wen Jiabao, and Li Keqiang.

A native of Gansu province, Tian was a graduate of the Central Party School in 1989. His rise through the ranks of the central government agencies made him a symbol of the technocratic elite. His detention signals that Beijing isn't afraid to probe deep into the history of its most established civil servants.

Beijing’s Unrelenting Governance Drive

This latest probe follows President Xi Jinping's New Year speech, where he vowed to maintain growth and internal stability. The crackdown on "tigers" remains a cornerstone of his governance strategy. Analysts believe that investigating a figure with such deep ties to the State Council reinforces the message that no office is beyond the reach of the CCDI.

This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.

Related Articles