Liabooks Home|PRISM News
Illustration of the disparity between managers and workers in AI usage.
ViralAI Analysis

The AI Productivity Gap: Why 40% of Workers Are Ready to Quit AI

2 min readSource

Reports from Section and Workday reveal a massive AI productivity gap. 85% of time saved by AI is wasted on error correction, leading 40% of workers to sour on the tech.

Is your boss preaching the virtues of AI while you're stuck cleaning up its mess? You're definitely not alone. A new study from AI consulting firm Section surveyed 5,000 white-collar employees and found a massive disconnect between managers and their staff regarding AI productivity.

The Disparity in AI Productivity Benefits

Executives are reaping the rewards of the AI boom. In the study, 33% of leaders said AI saves them 4 to 8 hours a week, while 19% claimed savings of over 12 hours. However, the sentiment flips for non-managerial staff. A staggering 40% of workers reported that AI hasn't saved them any time at all, and only 2% feel they're saving more than half a day's work per week.

The Error Correction Trap: Where Saved Time Goes

Even the time allegedly saved by AI is under scrutiny. A report from Workday, highlighted by the Wall Street Journal, suggests that 85% of employees who 'saved time' actually spent that duration correcting AI-generated errors. This "efficiency" seems to be an illusion for the majority. While the tech sector has embraced tools for tasks like 'vibe coding,' other industries like retail are seeing almost zero practical benefits, with 85% of total respondents lacking any advanced AI use cases.

The frustration is real: 40% of workers say they'd be fine never using AI again. This trend aligns with a warning from Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella at Davos, who noted that the industry risks losing 'social permission' if the technology doesn't show tangible improvements in public sector efficiency and small business competitiveness.

This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.

Thoughts

Related Articles