Liabooks Home|PRISM News
Smart Cities vs. Ancestral Lands: Philippines New Clark City Aeta Land Rights Under Fire
PoliticsAI Analysis

Smart Cities vs. Ancestral Lands: Philippines New Clark City Aeta Land Rights Under Fire

2 min readSource

The Philippines' New Clark City project faces backlash as Aeta indigenous communities fight for land rights against a $515m stadium development. PRISM explores the cost of progress.

Is a "Taylor Swift-ready" stadium worth the displacement of a community that has lived on the land for millennia? While the Philippine government pushes a $515m infrastructure blitz to attract global investors and pop icons, the indigenous Aeta people find themselves treated like squatters on their own soil. As New Clark City rises from a former U.S. military base, the fight for Philippines New Clark City Aeta land rights has reached a critical boiling point.

The Crisis of Philippines New Clark City Aeta Land Rights

Two hours north of Manila, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr is transforming the former Clark Air Base into a multibillion-dollar "smart city." However, according to Al Jazeera, the village of Sapang Kawayan—home to roughly 500 families—lies directly in the path of development. The Aeta Hungey tribe claims their presence predates both American and Spanish colonial rule, yet their legal rights remain unrecognized.

U.S. military dispossesses Aetas to build Clark Air Base.
U.S. turns over the base to the Philippine government; BCDA takes control.
Construction of New Clark City begins.
Aeta tribes expedite CADT applications as stadium construction nears.

The Bases Conversion and Development Authority (BCDA) maintains that the land belongs to the state, citing its history as a military reservation. While the BCDA offers compensation of $0.51 per square meter, activists denounce this as a pittance for the loss of ancestral heritage. The only legal shield for the tribe is the Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT), but the application process is notoriously difficult.

Bureaucratic Hurdles for Indigenous Claims

To secure a CADT, the NCIP requires proof of residence "since time immemorial." This includes documenting genealogies of at least five clans and providing maps that predating colonial records. Indigenous psychology experts liken the process to "defending a dissertation," a task nearly impossible for communities with limited access to formal education.

This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.

Related Articles