I Was Manipulated": Norway's Crown Princess Breaks Her Epstein Silence

She Googled him. She saw the results. She kept writing anyway.

That single detail — buried inside a 20-minute television interview broadcast Thursday — may define how history remembers Crown Princess Mette-Marit of Norway's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. After seven weeks of silence, Norway's future queen finally spoke. And the story she told raised as many questions as it answered.

The Emails, the House, the Uneasy Feeling

The crisis began at the end of January, when the US Justice Department released a tranche of Epstein-related files. Among them: evidence that Mette-Marit had exchanged hundreds of emails with the disgraced financier between 2011 and 2014, and had stayed at his Palm Beach, Florida home while he was away.

For Norwegians, it was a gut punch. Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre publicly called for her to explain herself. The palace stayed quiet. Seven weeks passed.

On Thursday — the final day of her son Marius Borg Høiby's rape trial — the crown princess sat down with national broadcaster NRK, her husband Crown Prince Haakon beside her, and spoke.

"I feel so manipulated," she said, visibly fighting back tears. "And when you are manipulated, you don't realise it from the start."

She insisted she "didn't know he was a sex offender or a predator." But the interviewer pushed back: a Wikipedia article on Epstein at the time clearly documented his 2008 conviction for soliciting underage sex. Her response: "I can't remember this; it was 15 years ago, to be honest."

What makes that harder to accept is a line from her own 2011 email to Epstein — written three years after his conviction: "Googled u after last email. Agree didn't look too good." She continued the correspondence regardless.

Sponsored

Advertise with Us

[email protected]

Sponsored

She also described an unnamed "situation" during her stay at his Florida home that left her feeling unsafe — enough to call her husband. Haakon confirmed he remembered the call. Yet contact with Epstein continued for some time after that.

The Timing Is Everything

The interview was recorded Thursday — the closing day of her son's rape trial, which began in early February, just days after the Epstein files dropped. A verdict isn't expected until June. The sequencing seems deliberate: wait for the trial to conclude, then speak.

Layered beneath the scandal is a more personal reality. Mette-Marit, 52, lives with pulmonary fibrosis, a serious and progressive lung disease. When asked whether she had the will to continue in her royal role, she was direct: "That is the very thing that decides, quite plainly, whether I can continue to perform in the role I hold, or not."

Her husband offered perhaps the interview's most quietly powerful moment: "This is, after all, our project, which we're doing together."

Three Ways to Read This

Sympathetic observers will note that Mette-Marit did something many public figures refuse to do — she sat in front of cameras, admitted to poor judgment, and said plainly that she wished she'd never met him. She acknowledged her victims-first framing, expressing "great anger" that Epstein's survivors have not yet received justice.

Skeptics will find the "I didn't know" defense difficult to swallow. Epstein's crimes were publicly documented. His Wikipedia page named his conviction. She saw the Google results herself. The question isn't whether she was naive — it's whether naivety is a sufficient answer for someone in her position.

Epstein's survivors occupy a different plane entirely. Each time a prominent figure steps forward with a "I was deceived" narrative, there's a risk that the focus shifts from the victims' suffering to the reputations of the well-connected. Mette-Marit acknowledged this herself — but acknowledgment and accountability are not the same thing.

There's also a structural question the interview didn't fully address: why did neither the palace nor the Norwegian foreign ministry know about her contact with Epstein? She called him a "private contact" and said she doesn't share all her private contacts. That answer may be technically true. It is also, for a future head of state, a remarkable thing to say.