US-China strategic rivalry 2035: Why Beijing Might Reach Equal Footing
Political scientist Yan Xuetong predicts that by 2035, China will reach equal footing with the US in strategic rivalry, leading to a new era of issue-based side-picking.
They're shaking hands, but their fists remain clenched. Yan Xuetong, a leading Chinese political scientist, predicts that by 2035, the United States will likely lose its clear strategic edge over China. In his latest book, 'Inflection of History: International Configuration and Order 2025-2035', Yan argues that the next 10 years will redefine global power dynamics.
A Decade of Intense US-China Strategic Rivalry
According to the South China Morning Post, the honorary dean of Tsinghua University believes the competition will stay intense. He warns of potential escalations during Donald Trump's second term, which could lead to a diplomatic crisis. However, as the two superpowers reach a state of parity by 2035, the risk of a direct hot war might actually decrease under subsequent administrations because neither side will have a decisive advantage.
New Global Order: Side-Picking and Neutrality
Yan's vision for 2035 suggests that 'issue-based side-picking' will become the new normal. He expects Russia and Brazil to forge stronger strategic ties with Beijing than with Washington. Meanwhile, major European players like Germany and France are predicted to pursue relative neutrality, hedging their bets between the two giants to protect their own interests.
Traditional US allies aren't exempt from this shift. While India, Japan, and the UK will likely keep closer ties with the US, Yan expects them to be less proactive in Washington's containment efforts against China. This reflects a growing trend of nations prioritizing national sovereignty and economic pragmatism over rigid alliance blocks.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
Russia is surprisingly praising Donald Trump’s 2026 Greenland annexation plan, using the rift in NATO to its geopolitical advantage. Discover the strategy behind Moscow's gloating.
Trump links his Greenland ambition to a Nobel Peace Prize snub, threatening EU allies with tariffs. Explore the $108 billion trade war risk and NATO's deepening crisis.
Israeli Minister Bezalel Smotrich criticizes Trump's Gaza plan as 'bad for Israel.' Explore the geopolitical shifts in Gaza, Syria, and Russia's winter strategy.
President Trump proposes a U.S.-led 'Board of Peace' for Gaza while preparing federal troop deployment to address immigration protests in Minnesota.